Exponential-Time Approximation (Schemes) for Vertex-Ordering Problems

Matthias Bentert; Fedor V. Fomin; Tanmay Inamdar; Saket Saurabh

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.10909

Exponential-Time Approximation (Schemes) for Vertex-Ordering Problems

Matthias Bentert·Fedor V. Fomin·Tanmay Inamdar·Saket Saurabh

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we begin the exploration of vertex-ordering problems through the lens of exponential-time approximation algorithms. In particular, we ask the following question: Can we simultaneously beat the running times of the fastest known (exponential-time) exact algorithms and the best known approximation factors that can be achieved in polynomial time? Following the recent research initiated by Esmer et al. (ESA 2022, IPEC 2023, SODA 2024) on vertex-subset problems, and by Inamdar et al. (ITCS 2024) on graph-partitioning problems, we focus on vertex-ordering problems. In particular, we give positive results for Feedback Arc Set, Optimal Linear Arrangement, Cutwidth, and Pathwidth. Most of our algorithms build upon a novel ``balanced-cut'' approach, which is our main conceptual contribution. This allows us to solve various problems in very general settings allowing for directed and arc-weighted input graphs. Our main technical contribution is a (1+{\epsilon})-approximation for any {\epsilon} > 0 for (weighted) Feedback Arc Set in O*((2-{\delta})^n) time, where {\delta} > 0 is a constant only depending on {\epsilon}.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Matthias Bentert, Fedor V. Fomin, Tanmay Inamdar, Saket Saurabh. 2025-02-15. Exponential-Time Approximation (Schemes) for Vertex-Ordering Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10909

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗