Faster diameter computation in graphs of bounded Euler genus

Kacper Kluk; Marcin Pilipczuk; Michał Pilipczuk; Giannos Stamoulis

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.07501

Faster diameter computation in graphs of bounded Euler genus

Kacper Kluk·Marcin Pilipczuk·Michał Pilipczuk·Giannos Stamoulis

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We show that for any fixed integer $k \geq 0$, there exists an algorithm that computes the diameter and the eccentricies of all vertices of an input unweighted, undirected $n$-vertex graph of Euler genus at most $k$ in time \[ \mathcal{O}_k(n^{2-\frac{1}{25}}). \] Furthermore, for the more general class of graphs that can be constructed by clique-sums from graphs that are of Euler genus at most $k$ after deletion of at most $k$ vertices, we show an algorithm for the same task that achieves the running time bound \[ \mathcal{O}_k(n^{2-\frac{1}{356}} \log^{6k} n). \] Up to today, the only known subquadratic algorithms for computing the diameter in those graph classes are that of [Ducoffe, Habib, Viennot; SICOMP 2022], [Le, Wulff-Nilsen; SODA 2024], and [Duraj, Konieczny, Pot\k{e}pa; ESA 2024]. These algorithms work in the more general setting of $K_h$-minor-free graphs, but the running time bound is $\mathcal{O}_h(n^{2-c_h})$ for some constant $c_h > 0$ depending on $h$. That is, our savings in the exponent, as compared to the naive quadratic algorithm, are independent of the parameter $k$. The main technical ingredient of our work is an improved bound on the number of distance profiles, as defined in [Le, Wulff-Nilsen; SODA 2024], in graphs of bounded Euler genus.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kacper Kluk, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, Giannos Stamoulis. 2025-02-11. Faster diameter computation in graphs of bounded Euler genus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07501

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗