arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2502.00345

CTC: The Composite Task Challenge for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

The critical role of division of labor (DOL) in enhancing cooperation is well-recognized in real-world applications. Consequently, many cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods have incorporated DOL mechanisms to improve cooperation among agents. However, the lack of benchmark tasks specifically designed to evaluate and promote DOL and cooperation has limited the effective development and deployment of such mechanisms in cooperative MARL. This gap between current cooperative MARL methods and practical applications underscores the need for evaluation tasks that explicitly require DOL and cooperation. To address this gap, we propose the Composite Tasks Challenge (CTC), a suite of tasks explicitly designed to require both DOL and cooperation for successful task completion. The CTC tasks are constructed based on two core design principles: 1) DOL is a necessary condition for task success; 2) Failure in any atomic subtask results in failure of the overall task. The first principle emphasizes the necessity of DOL, while the second enforces the importance of cooperation, making both components essential for success in CTC tasks. We evaluate nine representative cooperative MARL methods on the proposed CTC tasks. Experimental results show that all methods consistently achieve zero test winning rates across all CTC tasks, highlighting the challenge of CTC tasks and the limitations of current methods. To facilitate future research, we also introduce a guiding solution that achieves non-zero test winning rates on all tasks, thereby demonstrating the solvability of the CTC tasks. However, the performance of this guiding solution remains suboptimal, further underscoring the value of CTC tasks as a challenging and meaningful testbed for advancing cooperative MARL research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yurui Li, Yuxuan Chen, Xiaoli Yang, Shijian Li, Gang Pan. 2025-02-01. CTC: The Composite Task Challenge for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG