arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.18542

Semantic Web and Creative AI -- A Technical Report from ISWS 2023

Raia Abu Ahmad·Reham Alharbi·Roberto Barile·Martin Böckling·Francisco Bolanos·Sara Bonfitto·Oleksandra Bruns·Irene Celino·Yashrajsinh Chudasama·Martin Critelli·Claudia d'Amato·Giada D'Ippolito·Ioannis Dasoulas·Stefano De Giorgis·Vincenzo De Leo·Chiara Di Bonaventura·Marco Di Panfilo·Daniil Dobriy·John Domingue·Xuemin Duan·Michel Dumontier·Sefika Efeoglu·Ruben Eschauzier·Fakih Ginwa·Nicolas Ferranti·Arianna Graciotti·Philipp Hanisch·George Hannah·Golsa Heidari·Aidan Hogan·Hassan Hussein·Alexane Jouglar·Jan-Christoph Kalo·Manoé Kieffer·Antonis Klironomos·Inês Koch·Weronika Lajewska·Nicolas Lazzari·Mikael Lindekrans·Anna Sofia Lippolis·Majlinda Llugiqi·Eleonora Mancini·Eleonora Marzi·Laura Menotti·Daniela Milon Flores·Soulakshmee Nagowah·Kerstin Neubert·Emetis Niazmand·Ebrahim Norouzi·Beatriz Olarte Martinez·Anouk Michelle Oudshoorn·Andrea Poltronieri·Valentina Presutti·Disha Purohit·Ensiyeh Raoufi·Celian Ringwald·Johanna Rockstroh·Sebastian Rudolph·Harald Sack·Zafar Saeed·Mohammad Javad Saeedizade·Aya Sahbi·Cristian Santini·Aleksandra Simic·Dennis Sommer·Rita Sousa·Mary Ann Tan·Vidyashree Tarikere·Tabea Tietz·Liam Tirpitz·Arnaldo Tomasino·Frank van Harmelen·Joao Vissoci·Caitlin Woods·Bohui Zhang·Xinyue Zhang·Heng Zheng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The International Semantic Web Research School (ISWS) is a week-long intensive program designed to immerse participants in the field. This document reports a collaborative effort performed by ten teams of students, each guided by a senior researcher as their mentor, attending ISWS 2023. Each team provided a different perspective to the topic of creative AI, substantiated by a set of research questions as the main subject of their investigation. The 2023 edition of ISWS focuses on the intersection of Semantic Web technologies and Creative AI. ISWS 2023 explored various intersections between Semantic Web technologies and creative AI. A key area of focus was the potential of LLMs as support tools for knowledge engineering. Participants also delved into the multifaceted applications of LLMs, including legal aspects of creative content production, humans in the loop, decentralised approaches to multimodal generative AI models, nanopublications and AI for personal scientific knowledge graphs, commonsense knowledge in automatic story and narrative completion, generative AI for art critique, prompt engineering, automatic music composition, commonsense prototyping and conceptual blending, and elicitation of tacit knowledge. As Large Language Models and semantic technologies continue to evolve, new exciting prospects are emerging: a future where the boundaries between creative expression and factual knowledge become increasingly permeable and porous, leading to a world of knowledge that is both informative and inspiring.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raia Abu Ahmad, Reham Alharbi, Roberto Barile, Martin Böckling, Francisco Bolanos, Sara Bonfitto, Oleksandra Bruns, Irene Celino, Yashrajsinh Chudasama, Martin Critelli, Claudia d'Amato, Giada D'Ippolito, Ioannis Dasoulas, Stefano De Giorgis, Vincenzo De Leo, Chiara Di Bonaventura, Marco Di Panfilo, Daniil Dobriy, John Domingue, Xuemin Duan, Michel Dumontier, Sefika Efeoglu, Ruben Eschauzier, Fakih Ginwa, Nicolas Ferranti, Arianna Graciotti, Philipp Hanisch, George Hannah, Golsa Heidari, Aidan Hogan, Hassan Hussein, Alexane Jouglar, Jan-Christoph Kalo, Manoé Kieffer, Antonis Klironomos, Inês Koch, Weronika Lajewska, Nicolas Lazzari, Mikael Lindekrans, Anna Sofia Lippolis, Majlinda Llugiqi, Eleonora Mancini, Eleonora Marzi, Laura Menotti, Daniela Milon Flores, Soulakshmee Nagowah, Kerstin Neubert, Emetis Niazmand, Ebrahim Norouzi, Beatriz Olarte Martinez, Anouk Michelle Oudshoorn, Andrea Poltronieri, Valentina Presutti, Disha Purohit, Ensiyeh Raoufi, Celian Ringwald, Johanna Rockstroh, Sebastian Rudolph, Harald Sack, Zafar Saeed, Mohammad Javad Saeedizade, Aya Sahbi, Cristian Santini, Aleksandra Simic, Dennis Sommer, Rita Sousa, Mary Ann Tan, Vidyashree Tarikere, Tabea Tietz, Liam Tirpitz, Arnaldo Tomasino, Frank van Harmelen, Joao Vissoci, Caitlin Woods, Bohui Zhang, Xinyue Zhang, Heng Zheng. 2025-01-30. Semantic Web and Creative AI -- A Technical Report from ISWS 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗