arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.09448

The Reconstruction of Theaetetus' Theory of Ratios of Magnitudes

Stelios Negrepontis·Dimitrios Protopapas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the present chapter, we obtain the reconstruction of Theaetetus' theory of ratios of magnitudes based, according to Aristotle's Topics 158b, on the definition of proportion in terms of equal anthyphairesis. Our reconstruction is built on the anthyphairetic interpretation of the notoriously difficult Theaetetus 147d6-e1 passage on Theaetetus' mathematical discovery of quadratic incommensurabilities, itself based on the traces it has left on Plato's philosophical definition of Knowledge in his dialogues Theaetetus, Sophist and Meno. Contrary to earlier reconstructions by Becker, van der Waerden and Knorr, our reconstruction reveals a theory that (a) applies only to the restricted class of pairs of magnitudes whose anthyphairesis is finite or eventually periodic, and (b) avoids the problematic use of Eudoxus' definition 4 of Book V of Euclid's Elements. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in the book Essays on Topology: Dedicated to Valentin Po\'enaru, ed. L. Funar and A. Papadopoulos, Springer, 2025.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stelios Negrepontis, Dimitrios Protopapas. 2025-01-16. The Reconstruction of Theaetetus' Theory of Ratios of Magnitudes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09448

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗