arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2412.19963

Linear Shrinkage Convexification of Penalized Linear Regression With Missing Data

Abstract

One of the common challenges faced by researchers in recent data analysis is missing values. In the context of penalized linear regression, which has been extensively explored over several decades, missing values introduce bias and yield a non-positive definite covariance matrix of the covariates, rendering the least square loss function non-convex. In this paper, we propose a novel procedure called the linear shrinkage positive definite (LPD) modification to address this issue. The LPD modification aims to modify the covariance matrix of the covariates in order to ensure consistency and positive definiteness. Employing the new covariance estimator, we are able to transform the penalized regression problem into a convex one, thereby facilitating the identification of sparse solutions. Notably, the LPD modification is computationally efficient and can be expressed analytically. In the presence of missing values, we establish the selection consistency and prove the convergence rate of the $\ell_1$-penalized regression estimator with LPD, showing an $\ell_2$-error convergence rate of square-root of $\log p$ over $n$ by a factor of $(s_0)^{3/2}$ ($s_0$: the number of non-zero coefficients). To further evaluate the effectiveness of our approach, we analyze real data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset. This dataset provides incomplete measurements of drug sensitivities of cell lines and their protein expressions. We conduct a series of penalized linear regression models with each sensitivity value serving as a response variable and protein expressions as explanatory variables.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seongoh Park, Seongjin Lee, Nguyen Thi Hai Yen, Nguyen Phuoc Long, Johan Lim. 2024-12-28. Linear Shrinkage Convexification of Penalized Linear Regression With Missing Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19963

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME