arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2412.10362

OP-LoRA: The Blessing of Dimensionality

Abstract

Low-rank adapters (LoRA) enable finetuning of large models with only a small number of parameters. However, they often suffer from an ill-conditioned loss landscape, leading to difficult optimization. Prior work addresses these challenges by aligning adapter updates with full finetuning gradients via custom optimizers, but these methods lack the flexibility to accommodate new adapter architectures and are computationally expensive. We instead introduce OP-LoRA, a novel method which replaces each LoRA adapter with weights predicted by an extra MLP, which is discarded after training. This temporarily allows additional parameters during training to improve optimization, yet requires less wall time than custom optimizers and zero extra cost at inference time because the MLP is discarded. Crucially, extending OP-LoRA to other adapters is as simple as modifying the size of the prediction head for each new adapter type. We show that OP-LoRA allows the optimization to adaptively increase or decrease step size, improving performance and decreasing sensitivity to learning rate. On both small and large-scale LoRA tuning tasks, we observe consistent performance gains of OP-LoRA relative to LoRA and its variants. We achieve especially notable improvements in image generation, with OP-LoRA CMMD scores improving by up to 15 points relative to LoRA. This allows OP-LoRA to achieve the performance of LoRA with half of the inference parameters.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Piotr Teterwak, Kate Saenko, Bryan A. Plummer, Ser-Nam Lim. 2024-12-13. OP-LoRA: The Blessing of Dimensionality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG