arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2411.12770

Intelligent Usability Evaluation for Fashion Websites

Abstract

Websites have become increasingly important in people's lives, fulfilling a wide range of needs across various domains such as shopping, education, news, and booking. Among the most heavily used website categories are online shopping platforms, whose usage has particularly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, as they eliminate time and geographical barriers, providing access to a broader customer base. For these websites to effectively meet user needs and deliver a positive experience, they must be well-designed and adhere to usability principles. However, some existing shopping websites are poorly designed and do not follow usability best practices, resulting in suboptimal user experiences. Traditional manual website evaluation methods are time-consuming, and there is a need for more intelligent, automated approaches, particularly those leveraging machine learning techniques. This study aims to assist fashion shopping website developers in improving the usability of their platforms by providing an intelligent approach that can evaluate website usability. The study employs two complementary approaches for the evaluation process. The first model utilizes a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to assess websites based on specific usability principles, while the second model is a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that evaluates websites using features extracted from their screenshot images. The datasets for this project were custom-built, comprising a textual dataset for the SVM model and a screenshot dataset for the CNN model. The results demonstrate that the SVM model achieved an impressive 99% accuracy, while the CNN model attained 69% accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of this intelligent approach to provide comprehensive, data-driven insights for improving the usability of fashion shopping websites.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Asmaa Hakami, Raneem Alqarni, Asmaa Muqaibil, Nahed Alowidi. 2024-11-18. Intelligent Usability Evaluation for Fashion Websites. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12770

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC