arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.09059

Sublinear Metric Steiner Tree via Improved Bounds for Set Cover

Sepideh Mahabadi·Mohammad Roghani·Jakub Tarnawski·Ali Vakilian
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the metric Steiner tree problem in the sublinear query model. In this problem, for a set of $n$ points $V$ in a metric space given to us by means of query access to an $n\times n$ matrix $w$, and a set of terminals $T\subseteq V$, the goal is to find the minimum-weight subset of the edges that connects all the terminal vertices. Recently, Chen, Khanna and Tan [SODA'23] gave an algorithm that uses $\widetilde{O}(n^{13/7})$ queries and outputs a $(2-\eta)$-estimate of the metric Steiner tree weight, where $\eta>0$ is a universal constant. A key component in their algorithm is a sublinear algorithm for a particular set cover problem where, given a set system $(U, F)$, the goal is to provide a multiplicative-additive estimate for $|U|-\textsf{SC}(U, F)$. Here $U$ is the set of elements, $F$ is the collection of sets, and $\textsf{SC}(U, F)$ denotes the optimal set cover size of $(U, F)$. In particular, their algorithm returns a $(1/4, \varepsilon\cdot|U|)$-multiplicative-additive estimate for this set cover problem using $\widetilde{O}(|F|^{7/4})$ membership oracle queries (querying whether a set $S$ contains an $e$), where $\varepsilon$ is a fixed constant. In this work, we improve the query complexity of $(2-\eta)$-estimating the metric Steiner tree weight to $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/3})$ by showing a $(1/2, \varepsilon \cdot |U|)$-estimate for the above set cover problem using $\widetilde{O}(|F|^{5/3})$ membership queries. To design our set cover algorithm, we estimate the size of a random greedy maximal matching for an auxiliary multigraph that the algorithm constructs implicitly, without access to its adjacency list or matrix.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sepideh Mahabadi, Mohammad Roghani, Jakub Tarnawski, Ali Vakilian. 2024-11-13. Sublinear Metric Steiner Tree via Improved Bounds for Set Cover. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09059

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗