arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.05854

Harmful YouTube Video Detection: A Taxonomy of Online Harm and MLLMs as Alternative Annotators

Claire Wonjeong Jo·Miki Wesołowska·Magdalena Wojcieszak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Short video platforms, such as YouTube, Instagram, or TikTok, are used by billions of users globally. These platforms expose users to harmful content, ranging from clickbait or physical harms to misinformation or online hate. Yet, detecting harmful videos remains challenging due to an inconsistent understanding of what constitutes harm and limited resources and mental tolls involved in human annotation. As such, this study advances measures and methods to detect harm in video content. First, we develop a comprehensive taxonomy for online harm on video platforms, categorizing it into six categories: Information, Hate and harassment, Addictive, Clickbait, Sexual, and Physical harms. Next, we establish multimodal large language models as reliable annotators of harmful videos. We analyze 19,422 YouTube videos using 14 image frames, 1 thumbnail, and text metadata, comparing the accuracy of crowdworkers (Mturk) and GPT-4-Turbo with domain expert annotations serving as the gold standard. Our results demonstrate that GPT-4-Turbo outperforms crowdworkers in both binary classification (harmful vs. harmless) and multi-label harm categorization tasks. Methodologically, this study extends the application of LLMs to multi-label and multi-modal contexts beyond text annotation and binary classification. Practically, our study contributes to online harm mitigation by guiding the definitions and identification of harmful content on video platforms.

Explore related subjects

cs.MMcs.AIcs.CVcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Claire Wonjeong Jo, Miki Wesołowska, Magdalena Wojcieszak. 2024-11-06. Harmful YouTube Video Detection: A Taxonomy of Online Harm and MLLMs as Alternative Annotators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SemABR: Measuring Video Semantic Fidelity with Multimodal LLMs for Adaptive Bitrate Streaming

Conventional video metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF measure visual distortion or perceptual quality, but they do not directly capture semantic preservation: whether compression retains a video's objects, actions, and temporal narrative. Existing Quality-of-Experience (QoE)-driven bitrate-selection and resource-allocation methods primarily aim to minimize rebuffering and bitrate switching while maximizing perceptual video quality, without explicitly considering semantic preservation. To address this gap, we introduce video semantic fidelity (SF), a metric that quantifies how well a compressed video preserves the semantic content of its source. An offline multimodal large language model (MLLM) generates structured descriptions of the reference and compressed versions of the video, and a separate text-only large language model (LLM) evaluates their semantic correspondence. The resulting content-dependent SF--bitrate profiles are cached and queried by the online bitrate selector without invoking MLLMs at runtime. Evaluations on three subjective QoE benchmarks show a consistent positive association between SF and mean opinion scores (MOS). A separate human semantic-rating study evaluates semantic preservation and shows that SF correlates more strongly with human judgments than conventional video metrics. We then embed these profiles into a 5G MEC-assisted video-on-demand (VoD) resource-allocation framework at the base station. When wireless resources cannot support high bitrate levels for all users, the framework uses the SF--bitrate profiles to select bitrate levels jointly across users and reduce the semantic loss caused by the required bitrate reductions. NS-3 simulations with the 5G NR module show that the proposed framework achieves higher average and worst-user SF than the evaluated baselines, with a widening advantage as the wireless resources available to each user decrease.

cs.MM↗
arXiv2026

Multimodal Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis Based on Gated Noise Filtering and Emotion-Relevance Interaction

Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (MABSA) infers fine-grained sentiment polarity toward specific aspects by jointly modeling text and images. Despite progress in cross-modal fusion, two challenges remain in multi-aspect settings: (1) multimodal noise, where aspect-irrelevant content distracts sentiment learning; and (2) weak cross-modal sentiment alignment, as visual evidence can be ambiguous and textual--visual sentiments may conflict, limiting multimodal complementarity. To address these issues, we propose a Gated Noise-filtered Sentiment-Relevance Interaction (GNSRI) framework. It employs a gated noise-filtering module to suppress sentiment-irrelevant features and enhance aspect-aware sentiment cues, and a sentiment-relevance interaction module to capture consistent and conflicting cross-modal signals at micro and macro levels. Finally, a learnable decision fusion mechanism adaptively combines predictions from textual, visual, and cross-modal branches at the aspect level. Experiments on public MABSA benchmarks show that GNSRI outperforms state-of-the-art methods, improving accuracy by 1.94\% and 2.06\% on Twitter-2015 and Twitter-2017, respectively.

cs.MM↗
arXiv2026

AVID: A Benchmark for Omni-Modal Audio-Visual Inconsistency Understanding via Agent-Driven Construction

We present AVID, the first large-scale benchmark for audio-visual inconsistency understanding in videos. While omni-modal large language models excel at temporally aligned tasks such as captioning and question answering, they struggle to perceive cross-modal conflicts, a fundamental human capability that is critical for trustworthy AI. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on aligned events or deepfake detection, leaving a significant gap in evaluating inconsistency perception in long-form video contexts. AVID addresses this with: (1) a scalable construction pipeline comprising temporal segmentation that classifies video content into Active Speaker, Voiceover, and Scenic categories; an agent-driven strategy planner that selects semantically appropriate inconsistency categories; and five specialized injectors for diverse audio-visual conflict injection; (2) 11.2K long videos (avg. 235.5s) with 39.4K annotated inconsistency events and 78.7K segment clips, supporting evaluation across detection, temporal grounding, classification, and reasoning with 8 fine-grained inconsistency categories. Comprehensive evaluations of state-of-the-art omni-models reveal significant limitations in temporal grounding and reasoning. Our fine-tuned baseline, AVID-Qwen, achieves substantial improvements over the base model (2.8$\times$ higher BLEU-4 in segment reasoning) and surpasses all compared models in temporal grounding (mIoU: 36.1\% vs 26.2\%) and holistic understanding (SODA-m: 7.47 vs 6.15), validating AVID as an effective testbed for advancing trustworthy omni-modal AI systems.

cs.MM↗