arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2411.03227

Tight Sampling Bounds for Eigenvalue Approximation

Abstract

We consider the problem of estimating the spectrum of a symmetric bounded entry (not necessarily PSD) matrix via entrywise sampling. This problem was introduced by [Bhattacharjee, Dexter, Drineas, Musco, Ray '22], where it was shown that one can obtain an $\epsilon n$ additive approximation to all eigenvalues of $A$ by sampling a principal submatrix of dimension $\frac{\text{poly}(\log n)}{\epsilon^3}$. We improve their analysis by showing that it suffices to sample a principal submatrix of dimension $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ (with no dependence on $n$). This matches known lower bounds and therefore resolves the sample complexity of this problem up to $\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ factors. Using similar techniques, we give a tight $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ bound for obtaining an additive $\epsilon\|A\|_F$ approximation to the spectrum of $A$ via squared row-norm sampling, improving on the previous best $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{8}})$ bound. We also address the problem of approximating the top eigenvector for a bounded entry, PSD matrix $A.$ In particular, we show that sampling $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ columns of $A$ suffices to produce a unit vector $u$ with $u^T A u \geq \lambda_1(A) - \epsilon n$. This matches what one could achieve via the sampling bound of [Musco, Musco'17] for the special case of approximating the top eigenvector, but does not require adaptivity. As additional applications, we observe that our sampling results can be used to design a faster eigenvalue estimation sketch for dense matrices resolving a question of [Swartworth, Woodruff'23], and can also be combined with [Musco, Musco'17] to achieve $O(1/\epsilon^3)$ (adaptive) sample complexity for approximating the spectrum of a bounded entry PSD matrix to $\epsilon n$ additive error.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

William Swartworth, David P. Woodruff. 2024-11-05. Tight Sampling Bounds for Eigenvalue Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03227

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS