arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2411.02845

Max-Distance Sparsification for Diversification and Clustering

Abstract

Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a set family that is the solution domain of some combinatorial problem. The \emph{max-min diversification problem on $\mathcal{D}$} is the problem to select $k$ sets from $\mathcal{D}$ such that the Hamming distance between any two selected sets is at least $d$. FPT algorithms parameterized by $k+\ell $, where $\ell=\max_{D\in \mathcal{D}}|D|$, and $k+d$ have been actively studied recently for several specific domains. This paper provides unified algorithmic frameworks to solve this problem. Specifically, for each parameterization $k+\ell $ and $k+d$, we provide an FPT oracle algorithm for the max-min diversification problem using oracles related to $\mathcal{D}$. We then demonstrate that our frameworks provide the first FPT algorithms on several new domains $\mathcal{D}$, including the domain of $t$-linear matroid intersection, almost $2$-SAT, minimum edge $s,t$-flows, vertex sets of $s,t$-mincut, vertex sets of edge bipartization, and Steiner trees. We also demonstrate that our frameworks generalize most of the existing domain-specific tractability results. Our main technical breakthrough is introducing the notion of \emph{max-distance sparsifier} of $\mathcal{D}$, a domain on which the max-min diversification problem is equivalent to the same problem on the original domain $\mathcal{D}$. The core of our framework is to design FPT oracle algorithms that construct a constant-size max-distance sparsifier of $\mathcal{D}$. Using max-distance sparsifiers, we provide FPT algorithms for the max-min and max-sum diversification problems on $\mathcal{D}$, as well as $k$-center and $k$-sum-of-radii clustering problems on $\mathcal{D}$, which are also natural problems in the context of diversification and have their own interests.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soh Kumabe. 2024-11-05. Max-Distance Sparsification for Diversification and Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02845

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS