arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2410.21550

Deterministic complexity analysis of Hermitian eigenproblems

Abstract

In this work we revisit the arithmetic and bit complexity of Hermitian eigenproblems. Recently, [BGVKS, FOCS 2020] proved that a (non-Hermitian) matrix can be diagonalized with a randomized algorithm in $O(n^{\omega}\log^2(n/\epsilon))$ arithmetic operations, where $\omega\lesssim 2.371$ is the square matrix multiplication exponent, and [Shah, SODA 2025] significantly improved the bit complexity for the Hermitian case. Our main goal is to obtain similar deterministic complexity bounds for various Hermitian eigenproblems. In the Real RAM model, we show that a Hermitian matrix can be diagonalized deterministically in $O(n^{\omega}\log(n)+n^2\mathrm{polylog}(n/\epsilon))$ arithmetic operations, improving the classic deterministic $\widetilde O(n^3)$ algorithms, and derandomizing the aforementioned state-of-the-art. The main technical step is a complete, detailed analysis of a well-known divide-and-conquer tridiagonal eigensolver of Gu and Eisenstat [GE95], when accelerated with the Fast Multipole Method, asserting that it can accurately diagonalize a symmetric tridiagonal matrix in nearly-$O(n^2)$ operations. In finite precision, we show that an algorithm by Sch\"onhage [Sch72] to reduce a Hermitian matrix to tridiagonal form is stable in the floating point model, using $O(\log(n/\epsilon))$ bits of precision. This leads to a deterministic algorithm to compute all the eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix in $O\left(n^{\omega}\mathcal{F}\left(\log(n/\epsilon)\right)+n^2\mathrm{polylog}(n/\epsilon)\right)$ bit operations, where $\mathcal{F}(b)\in\widetilde O(b)$ is the bit complexity of a single floating point operation on $b$ bits. This improves the best known $\widetilde{O}(n^3)$ deterministic and $O\left(n^{\omega}\log^2(n/\epsilon)\mathcal{F}\left(\log(n/\epsilon)\right)\right)$ randomized complexities. We conclude with some other useful subroutines and with open problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aleksandros Sobczyk. 2024-10-28. Deterministic complexity analysis of Hermitian eigenproblems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21550

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS