arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.03221

Learning to steer with Brownian noise

Stefan Ankirchner·Sören Christensen·Jan Kallsen·Philip Le Borne·Stefan Perko
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper considers an ergodic version of the bounded velocity follower problem, assuming that the decision maker lacks knowledge of the underlying system parameters and must learn them while simultaneously controlling. We propose algorithms based on moving empirical averages and develop a framework for integrating statistical methods with stochastic control theory. Our primary result is a logarithmic expected regret rate. To achieve this, we conduct a rigorous analysis of the ergodic convergence rates of the underlying processes and the risks of the considered estimators.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LGmath.PRmath.STstat.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Ankirchner, Sören Christensen, Jan Kallsen, Philip Le Borne, Stefan Perko. 2024-10-04. Learning to steer with Brownian noise. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03221

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Neural Stochastic Differential Equations on Compact State Spaces: Theory, Methods, and Application to Suicide Risk Modeling

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies enable the collection of high-frequency self-reports of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) via smartphones. Latent stochastic differential equations (SDEs) are a promising model class for EMA data, as it is irregularly sampled, noisy, and partially observed. But SDE-based models suffer from two key limitations. (a) These models often violate domain constraints, undermining scientific validity and clinical trust of the model. (b) Training is numerically unstable without ad hoc fixes (e.g. oversimplified dynamics) that are ill-suited for high-stakes applications. Here, we develop a novel class of expressive SDEs whose solutions are provably confined to a prescribed compact polyhedral state space, matching the domains of EMA data. In this work, (1) we show why chain-rule based constructions of SDEs on compact domains fail, theoretically and empirically; (2) we derive constraints on drift and diffusion for general and stationary SDEs so their solutions remain in the desired state space; and (3), we introduce a parameterization that maps arbitrary (neural or expert-given) dynamics into constraint-satisfying SDEs. On several real EMA datasets, including a large suicide-risk study, our parameterization improves forecasts and optimization dynamics over standard latent neural SDE baselines. These contributions pave the way for principled, trustworthy continuous-time models of suicide risk and other clinical time series and extend applications of SDE-based methods (e.g. diffusion models) to domains with hard state constraints.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Nonnegative matrix factorizations and related compositional models: Equivalence, identifiability, and an application on the grain-size analysis of sediments

Across fields such as machine learning, social science, and geology, considerable attention has been given to models that factorize a nonnegative matrix into the product of two or three matrices, subject to nonnegative or row-sum-to-1 constraints. Although these models are to a large extent similar or even equivalent, they are presented under different names, and their similarity is not well known. This paper highlights similarities among five models, latent budget analysis (LBA) and latent class analysis (LCA) from social science, end-member analysis (EMA) from geology, probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) from machine learning. We focus on the identifiability of these models. We prove that the solution of LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA is unique if and only if the solution of NMF is unique. Consequently, existing uniqueness theorems for NMF directly apply to LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA, and vice versa. We also provide a brief review of algorithms for the estimation of these models. We illustrate NMF on a sedimentary grain-size distribution dataset from sedimentary geology, and end the paper with a discussion of closely related model: archetypal analysis.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

Automating theoretical research requires generating candidate results and evaluating them reliably. Models keep getting better at the first, while the second remains hard. A common approach asks one large language model (LLM) to review what another produced, yet such reviewers are empirically unreliable: they may accept fabricated papers and catch the fabrication at close to chance rates~\citep{badscientist2025}. We present \textsc{CausalSmith}, a framework for automated theoretical research in causal inference built on the Lean proof assistant, where a proof is checked by a program rather than read by a referee. \textsc{CausalSmith} rests on \textsc{Causalean}, a foundational Lean library for causal inference holding 8,179 machine-checked definitions and theorems, developed with language-model assistance under human design and review. Around it, we build a self-improving agentic pipeline that selects research topics, proposes results, formalizes statements, constructs proofs, and presents the resulting artifacts for human inspection. Moreover, the pipeline pairs Lean verification with a statement audit that compares each formal theorem against the informal claim behind it. We evaluate the system using artifacts produced by completed autonomous research runs. The source code, formal library, and run records are available at https://github.com/Jiyuan-Tan/CausalSmith.

stat.ML↗