arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2409.14680

S2O: An Integrated Driving Decision-making Performance Evaluation Method Bridging Subjective Feeling to Objective Evaluation

Yuning Wang·Zehong Ke·Yanbo Jiang·Jinhao Li·Shaobing Xu·John M. Dolan·Jianqiang Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Autonomous driving decision-making is one of the critical modules towards intelligent transportation systems, and how to evaluate the driving performance comprehensively and precisely is a crucial challenge. A biased evaluation misleads and hinders decision-making modification and development. Current planning evaluation metrics include deviation from the real driver trajectory and objective driving experience indicators. The former category does not necessarily indicate good driving performance since human drivers also make errors and has been proven to be ineffective in interactive close-loop systems. On the other hand, existing objective driving experience models only consider limited factors, lacking comprehensiveness. And the integration mechanism of various factors relies on intuitive experience, lacking precision. In this research, we propose S2O, a novel integrated decision-making evaluation method bridging subjective human feeling to objective evaluation. First, modified fundamental models of four kinds of driving factors which are safety, time efficiency, comfort, and energy efficiency are established to cover common driving factors. Then based on the analysis of human rating distribution regularity, a segmental linear fitting model in conjunction with a complementary SVM segment classifier is designed to express human's subjective rating by objective driving factor terms. Experiments are conducted on the D2E dataset, which includes approximately 1,000 driving cases and 40,000 human rating scores. Results show that S2O achieves a mean absolute error of 4.58 to ground truth under a percentage scale. Compared with baselines, the evaluation error is reduced by 32.55%. Implementation on the SUMO platform proves the real-time efficiency of online evaluation, and validation on performance evaluation of three autonomous driving planning algorithms proves the feasibility.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.HC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuning Wang, Zehong Ke, Yanbo Jiang, Jinhao Li, Shaobing Xu, John M. Dolan, Jianqiang Wang. 2024-09-23. S2O: An Integrated Driving Decision-making Performance Evaluation Method Bridging Subjective Feeling to Objective Evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗