arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2409.14467

Nonstandard polynomials: algebraic properties and elementary equivalence

Abstract

We solve the first-order classification problem for rings $R$ of polynomials $F[x_1, \ldots,x_n]$ and Laurent polynomials $F[x_1,x_1^{-1}, \ldots,x_n,x_n^{-1}]$ with coefficients in an infinite field $F$ or the ring of integers $\mathbb Z$, that is, we describe the algebraic structure of all rings $S$ that are first-order equivalent to $R$. Our approach is based on a new and very powerful method of regular bi-interpretations, or more precisely, regular invertible interpretations. Namely, we prove that $F[x_1, \ldots,x_n]$ and $F[x_1,x_1^{-1}, \ldots,x_n,x_n^{-1}]$ are regularly bi-interpretable with the list superstructure $\mathbb S(F,\mathbb N)$ of $F$, which is equivalent to regular bi-interpretation with the superstructure $HF(F)$ of hereditary finite sets over $F$. The expressive power of $\mathbb S(F,\mathbb N)$ is the same as that of the weak second-order logic over $F$. Hence, the first-order logic in $R = F[x_1, \ldots,x_n]$ or $R = F[x_1,x_1^{-1}, \ldots,x_n,x_n^{-1}]$ is equivalent to the weak second-order logic in $F$ (following the terminology of Kharlampovich, Myasnikov, and Sohrabi [16], such structures are necessarily rich), which allows one to describe the algebraic structure of all rings $S$ with $S\equiv R$. In fact, these rings $S$ are precisely the ``non-standard'' models of $R$, like in non-standard arithmetic or non-standard analysis. This is particularly straightforward when $F$ is regularly bi-interpretable with $\mathbb N$, in this case the ring $R$ is also bi-interpretable with $\mathbb N$. Using our approach, we describe various, sometimes rather surprising, algebraic and model-theoretic properties of the non-standard models of $R$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexei Myasnikov, Andrey Nikolaev. 2024-09-22. Nonstandard polynomials: algebraic properties and elementary equivalence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14467

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Borel sets in ideal topologies

We study the Borel and analytic subsets of the spaces ${}^κκ$ and ${}^κ2$ endowed with ideal topologies, where $κ$ is a regular uncountable cardinal, thereby addressing some open problems of the literature. We provide a systematic analysis of the Borel hierarchy for an arbitrary ideal topology. In particular, we formulate a sufficient condition ensuring that the hierarchy does not collapse, demonstrate that every Borel set in such a topology is analytic, and establish the existence of a set that is not Borel. Our main result shows that, when the underlying ideal contains an unbounded subset, the collection of analytic sets coincides with the full power set of the ambient space. Finally, we prove that the Approximation Lemma holds in the setting of ideal topologies.

math.LO

Inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable

Inquisitive first-order logic is an extension of classical first-order logic with formulas regimenting first-order questions, such as "whether all objects are P", "which objects are P", and "what is one object that is P". Since it was first developed in 2009, two major meta-theoretical questions about this logic have remained open, in spite of significant efforts. The first concerns compactness: if a conclusion follows from a set of premises, does it always follow from some finite subset? The second concerns the computational status of validity: is the set of validities recursively enumerable, or equivalently, does the logic admit a recursive axiomatization? We settle both questions in the negative, showing that inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable. Furthermore, we prove that it violates another signature property of first-order logic, namely, Craig interpolation. We discuss the significance of our results, and show how to extend them to a closely related logic, viz., inquisitive team logic.

math.LO

The Borel Distinguishing Number of Schreier Graphs

The Borel distinguishing number $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ of a Borel graph $\mathcal{G}$, recently introduced by Bilge and Kaya, is the minimum number of colors required to break the symmetry of $\mathcal{G}$ in a Borel way. In this paper, we investigate the Borel distinguishing number of Schreier graphs induced by the free part of the shift action $Γ\curvearrowright n^Γ$. We prove that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\le n+1$ for $Γ=\mathbb{Z}^d$ equipped with the standard generators. Moreover, we show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\ge n+1$ if $ Γ$ is amenable and $ \{γ\in \mathrm{Aut}(\mathrm{Cay}(Γ,S)) \mid γ(e) = e \}$ is non-trivial. We also show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ is finite if $Γ$ is finitely generated, and give some applications of our results. These results answer some questions raised by Bilge and Kaya.

math.LO