POI-SIMEX for Conditionally Poisson Distributed Biomarkers from Tissue Histology

Aijun Yang; Phineas T. Hamilton; Brad H. Nelson; Julian J. Lum; Mary Lesperance; Farouk S. Nathoo

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2409.14256

POI-SIMEX for Conditionally Poisson Distributed Biomarkers from Tissue Histology

Aijun Yang·Phineas T. Hamilton·Brad H. Nelson·Julian J. Lum·Mary Lesperance·Farouk S. Nathoo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Covariate measurement error in regression analysis is an important issue that has been studied extensively under the classical additive and the Berkson error models. Here, we consider cases where covariates are derived from tumor tissue histology, and in particular tissue microarrays. In such settings, biomarkers are evaluated from tissue cores that are subsampled from a larger tissue section so that these biomarkers are only estimates of the true cell densities. The resulting measurement error is non-negligible but is seldom accounted for in the analysis of cancer studies involving tissue microarrays. To adjust for this type of measurement error, we assume that these discrete-valued biomarkers are conditionally Poisson distributed, based on a Poisson process model governing the spatial locations of marker-positive cells. Existing methods for addressing conditional Poisson surrogates, particularly in the absence of internal validation data, are limited. We extend the simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) algorithm to accommodate the conditional Poisson case (POI-SIMEX), where measurement errors are non-Gaussian with heteroscedastic variance. The proposed estimator is shown to be strongly consistent in a linear regression model under the assumption of a conditional Poisson distribution for the observed biomarker. Simulation studies evaluate the performance of POI-SIMEX, comparing it with the naive method and an alternative corrected likelihood approach in linear regression and survival analysis contexts. POI-SIMEX is then applied to a study of high-grade serous cancer, examining the association between survival and the presence of triple-positive biomarker (CD3+CD8+FOXP3+ cells)

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Aijun Yang, Phineas T. Hamilton, Brad H. Nelson, Julian J. Lum, Mary Lesperance, Farouk S. Nathoo. 2025-09-08. POI-SIMEX for Conditionally Poisson Distributed Biomarkers from Tissue Histology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14256

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗