Revisiting the Time Cost Model of AllReduce

Abstract

AllReduce is an important and popular collective communication primitive, which has been widely used in areas such as distributed machine learning and high performance computing. To design, analyze, and choose from various algorithms and implementations of AllReduce, the time cost model plays a crucial role, and the predominant one is the $(α,β,γ)$ model. In this paper, we revisit this model, and reveal that it cannot well characterize the time cost of AllReduce on modern clusters; thus must be updated. We perform extensive measurements to identify two additional terms contributing to the time cost: the incast term and the memory access term. We augment the $(α,β,γ)$ model with these two terms, and present GenModel as a result. Using GenModel, we discover two new optimalities for AllReduce algorithms, and prove that they cannot be achieved simultaneously. Finally, striking the balance between the two new optimalities, we design GenTree, an AllReduce plan generation algorithm specialized for tree-like topologies. Experiments on a real testbed with 64 GPUs show that GenTree can achieve 1.22$\times$ to 1.65$\times$ speed-up against NCCL. Large-scale simulations also confirm that GenTree can improve the state-of-the-art AllReduce algorithm by a factor of $1.2$ to $7.4$ in scenarios where the two new terms dominate.