arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2408.10091

Non-Plug-In Estimators Could Outperform Plug-In Estimators: a Cautionary Note and a Diagnosis

Hongxiang Qiu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Objectives: Highly flexible nonparametric estimators have gained popularity in causal inference and epidemiology. Popular examples of such estimators include targeted maximum likelihood estimators (TMLE) and double machine learning (DML). TMLE is often argued or suggested to be better than DML estimators and several other estimators in small to moderate samples -- even if they share the same large-sample properties -- because TMLE is a plug-in estimator and respects the known bounds on the parameter, while other estimators might fall outside the known bounds and yield absurd estimates. However, this argument is not a rigorously proven result and may fail in certain cases. Methods: In a carefully chosen simulation setting, I compare the performance of several versions of TMLE and DML estimators of the average treatment effect among treated in small to moderate samples. Results: In this simulation setting, DML estimators outperforms some versions of TMLE in small samples. TMLE fluctuations are unstable, and hence empirically checking the magnitude of the TMLE fluctuation might alert cases where TMLE might perform poorly. Conclusions: As a plug-in estimator, TMLE is not guaranteed to outperform non-plug-in counterparts such as DML estimators in small samples. Checking the fluctuation magnitude might be a useful diagnosis for TMLE. More rigorous theoretical justification is needed to understand and compare the finite-sample performance of these highly flexible estimators in general.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hongxiang Qiu. 2024-08-19. Non-Plug-In Estimators Could Outperform Plug-In Estimators: a Cautionary Note and a Diagnosis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10091

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Generalised Covariances and Correlations

The covariance of two random variables measures the average joint deviations from their respective means. We generalise this well-known measure by replacing the means with other statistical functionals such as quantiles, expectiles, or thresholds. Deviations from these functionals are defined via generalised errors, typically induced through identification or moment functions. As a normalised measure of dependence, a generalised correlation is constructed. Replacing the common Cauchy--Schwarz normalisation by a novel Fréchet--Hoeffding normalisation, we obtain attainability of the entire interval $[-1, 1]$ for any given marginal distributions. We uncover favourable properties of these new dependence measures and establish consistent estimators. The families of quantile and threshold correlations make it possible to measure local dependence and give rise to function-valued distributional correlations, exhibiting the entire dependence structure. Quantile correlations also lead to tail correlations, new measures of tail dependence, closely related to and refining classical coefficients of tail dependence. Finally, we construct summary covariances (correlations), a class of regional or global dependence measures, which arise as (normalised) weighted averages of distributional covariances. We retrieve covariance, Pearson and Spearman correlation as special cases. The usefulness of our new dependence measures is illustrated on demographic data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Compressive Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization for mutational signatures analysis

Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is a popular tool for dimensionality reduction, especially for count matrices. However, inferring an appropriate number of factors is challenging. Existing approaches based on information criteria or nonparametric sparsity-inducing priors tend to be computationally burdensome or highly sensitive to prior choices. Moreover, theoretical properties of the posterior distribution of Poisson NMF parameters endowed with shrinkage priors remain under-explored. This paper introduces a novel Bayesian NMF method that automatically infers the number of factors while also incorporating information on the latent factors from previous studies. This is achieved using compressive hyperpriors, which are hierarchical priors that make the sample-specific weights of unneeded factors concentrate near zero in the posterior. We provide novel distribution theory for posterior inference to elucidate this shrinkage mechanism, both in finite samples and asymptotically. We apply our method to mutational signatures analysis in cancer genomics, in simulations and on real data from breast cancer. Compared to state-of-the-art alternatives, our method is more robust to mild overdispersion and improves detection and estimation of signatures aligned with prior information.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

On Relative Cumulative Residual Information Measure and Its Applications

We develop a relative cumulative residual information measure (RCRI) that aims to quantify the divergence between two survival functions. The dynamic relative cumulative residual information (DRCRI) measure is also introduced. We establish some characterization results under the assumption of the proportional hazards model. Additionally, we obtained the non-parametric estimators of RCRI and DRCRI measures based on the kernel density type estimator for the survival function. The effectiveness of the estimators are assessed through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. We consider data from the third Gaia data release (Gaia DR3) to demonstrate the use of the proposed measure. For this study, we have collected epoch photometry data for the objects Gaia DR3 4111834567779557376 and Gaia DR3 5090605830056251776. RCRI-based image analysis is conducted using Chest X-ray data from the publicly available dataset.

stat.ME↗