arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2408.03933

Lower Bounds for Approximate (& Exact) k-Disjoint-Shortest-Paths

Abstract

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $T=\{ (s_i, t_i) : 1\leq i\leq k \}\subseteq V\times V$ of $k$ pairs, the $k$-vertex-disjoint-paths (resp. $k$-edge-disjoint-paths) problem asks to determine whether there exist~$k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint (resp. edge-disjoint) paths $P_1, P_2, ..., P_k$ in $G$ such that, for each $1\leq i\leq k$, $P_i$ connects $s_i$ to $t_i$. Both the edge-disjoint and vertex-disjoint versions in undirected graphs are famously known to be FPT (parameterized by $k$) due to the Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour. Eilam-Tzoreff [DAM `98] introduced a variant, known as the $k$-disjoint-shortest-paths problem, where each individual path is further required to be a shortest path connecting its pair. They showed that the $k$-disjoint-shortest-paths problem is NP-complete on both directed and undirected graphs; this holds even if the graphs are planar and have unit edge lengths. We focus on four versions of the problem, corresponding to considering edge/vertex disjointness, and to considering directed/undirected graphs. Building on the reduction of Chitnis [SIDMA `23] for $k$-edge-disjoint-paths on planar DAGs, we obtain the following inapproximability lower bound for each of the four versions of $k$-disjoint-shortest-paths on $n$-vertex graphs: - Under Gap-ETH, there exists a constant $\delta>0$ such that for any constant $0<\epsilon\leq \frac{1}{2}$ and any computable function $f$, there is no $(\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon)$-approx in $f(k)\cdot n^{\delta\cdot k}$ time. We further strengthen our results as follows: Directed: Inapprox lower bound for edge-disjoint (resp. vertex-disjoint) paths holds even if the input graph is a planar (resp. 1-planar) DAG with max in-degree and max out-degree at most $2$. Undirected: Inapprox lower bound for edge-disjoint (resp. vertex-disjoint) paths hold even if the input graph is planar (resp. 1-planar) and has max degree $4$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rajesh Chitnis, Samuel Thomas, Anthony Wirth. 2024-08-07. Lower Bounds for Approximate (& Exact) k-Disjoint-Shortest-Paths. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03933

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS