Autoencoders in Function Space

Justin Bunker; Mark Girolami; Hefin Lambley; Andrew M. Stuart; T. J. Sullivan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2408.01362

Autoencoders in Function Space

Justin Bunker·Mark Girolami·Hefin Lambley·Andrew M. Stuart·T. J. Sullivan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Autoencoders have found widespread application in both their original deterministic form and in their variational formulation (VAEs). In scientific applications and in image processing it is often of interest to consider data that are viewed as functions; while discretisation (of differential equations arising in the sciences) or pixellation (of images) renders problems finite dimensional in practice, conceiving first of algorithms that operate on functions, and only then discretising or pixellating, leads to better algorithms that smoothly operate between resolutions. In this paper function-space versions of the autoencoder (FAE) and variational autoencoder (FVAE) are introduced, analysed, and deployed. Well-definedness of the objective governing VAEs is a subtle issue, particularly in function space, limiting applicability. For the FVAE objective to be well defined requires compatibility of the data distribution with the chosen generative model; this can be achieved, for example, when the data arise from a stochastic differential equation, but is generally restrictive. The FAE objective, on the other hand, is well defined in many situations where FVAE fails to be. Pairing the FVAE and FAE objectives with neural operator architectures that can be evaluated on any mesh enables new applications of autoencoders to inpainting, superresolution, and generative modelling of scientific data.

Explore related subjects

stat.ML cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Justin Bunker, Mark Girolami, Hefin Lambley, Andrew M. Stuart, T. J. Sullivan. 2026-08-31. Autoencoders in Function Space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.LG subject stat.ML subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Clustering Three-Way Data with Outliers

Matrix-variate distributions are a relatively recent addition to the model-based clustering literature, thereby making it possible to analyze data in matrix form with complex structure such as images and time series. Due to its recent appearance, there is limited literature on matrix-variate data, with even less on dealing with outliers in these models. An approach for clustering matrix-variate normal data with outliers is discussed. The approach, which uses the distribution of subset log-likelihoods, extends the OCLUST algorithm to matrix-variate normal data and uses an iterative approach to detect and trim outliers.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

One-Layer Transformer Provably Learns Multiclass One-Nearest Neighbor in Context

We extend recent work establishing an equivalence between one-layer transformers and nearest-neighbor classifiers in the binary setting to the multiclass case. By leveraging the simplex encoding, we show that one-layer transformers with an argmax classification head behave identically to a one-nearest-neighbor classifier in the multiclass setting. This closes a gap left by prior work, whose multiclass result relied on a non-standard rounding-based approach rather than the typical argmax head used in practice.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Learning a Size-Weight Frontier for Synthetic-Augmented Inference

Synthetic data can improve statistical inference when real data are scarce, but naively treating synthetic samples as real data can introduce bias and lead to unreliable inference. We develop a general framework for synthetic-augmented inference across a population of related tasks. It characterizes synthetic augmentation by the number of synthetic observations and their weight. Central to our framework is a size-weight frontier that specifies, for each weight, the largest synthetic sample size for which all smaller sizes attain the target task-marginal coverage. We estimate this frontier from historical tasks, and establish a finite-sample coverage guarantee simultaneously for all size-weight configurations on or below the estimated frontier. In experiments using large language model responses to augment opinion survey data, our procedure achieves target coverage and substantially narrows confidence intervals.

stat.ME↗