arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2407.10249

Low Sensitivity Hopsets

Abstract

Given a weighted graph $G$, a $(\beta,\varepsilon)$-hopset $H$ is an edge set such that for any $s,t \in V(G)$, where $s$ can reach $t$ in $G$, there is a path from $s$ to $t$ in $G \cup H$ which uses at most $\beta$ hops whose length is in the range $[dist_G(s,t), (1+\varepsilon)dist_G(s,t)]$. We break away from the traditional question that asks for a hopset that achieves small $|H|$ and instead study its sensitivity, a new quality measure which, informally, is the maximum number of times a vertex (or edge) is bypassed by an edge in $H$. The highlights of our results are: (i) $(\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n}),0)$-hopsets on undirected graphs with $O(\log n)$ sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ is tight up to polylogarithmic factors for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. (ii) $(n^{o(1)},\varepsilon)$-hopsets on undirected graphs with $n^{o(1)}$ sensitivity for any $\varepsilon > 0$ that is at least inverse polylogarithmic, complemented with a lower bound on the tradeoff between $\beta, \varepsilon$, and the sensitivity. (iii) $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$-shortcut sets on directed graphs with $O(\log n)$ sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that $\beta = \widetilde{\Omega}(n^{1/3})$ for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. We believe hopset sensitivity is a natural measure in and of itself, and could potentially find use in a diverse range of contexts. More concretely, the notion of hopset sensitivity is also directly motivated by the Differentially Private All Sets Range Queries problem. Our result for $O(\log n)$ sensitivity $(\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n}),0)$-hopsets on undirected graphs immediately improves the current best-known upper bound on utility from $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/3})$ to $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/4})$ in the pure-DP setting, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vikrant Ashvinkumar, Aaron Bernstein, Chengyuan Deng, Jie Gao, Nicole Wein. 2024-07-14. Low Sensitivity Hopsets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS