arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.06344

Corrections to a paper of Allard and Almgren on the uniqueness of tangent cones

William K. Allard
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The paper referred to in the title is Allard/Almgren 1981 [AA81]. Several months ago Francesco Maggi emailed me saying that the inequalities 5.3(4),(5) of \cite{AA81} were wrong. In fact, as he pointed out, their incorrectness is immediately apparent if one takes $Z=0$ there. Maggi and his coauthor wanted to use these inequalities in their paper \cite{MN}. They were able to obtain a version of these inequalities which suffice for the carrying out the work in \cite{MN}. I started writing this paper in order to provide a version of these inequalities as needed in [AA81]. In thinking about this material I began to realize there were other problems with the paper. As a result I ended up {\em completely rewriting 5.1-5.4 on pages 243-248 of \cite{AA81}}; this rewrite is the contents of this paper. In addition to many annoying misprints many of the needed definitions and proofs in 5.1-5.4 are incomplete or absent. For example, it is not said where $z$ in 5.1(2) comes from; this omission completely surprised me since I remember doing a lot of work to come up with $z$ when \cite{AA81} was being written. Also, much of the necessary material about the reach of a submanifold as in \cite{FE2} is not provided in \cite{AA81}. The table of contents can serve as an index. In particular one sees there where the constants $ε_1$ through $ε_6$ are introduced. This material is extremely technical. One way to navigate this paper would be to start looking at Proposition 9.5 and work backwards.

Explore related subjects

math.DG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William K. Allard. 2024-07-08. Corrections to a paper of Allard and Almgren on the uniqueness of tangent cones. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the topology of manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature and linear volume growth

Understanding the relationships between geometry and topology is a central theme in Riemannian geometry. We establish two results on the fundamental groups of open (complete and noncompact) $n$-manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature and linear volume growth. First, we show that the fundamental group of such a manifold contains a subgroup $\mathbb{Z}^k$ of finite index, where $0\le k\le n-1$. Second, we prove that if the Ricci curvature is positive everywhere, then the fundamental group is finite. The proofs are based on an analysis of the equivariant asymptotic geometry of successive covering spaces and a plane/halfplane rigidity result for RCD spaces.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

K-polystability of Asymptotically Conical Kähler-Ricci Shrinkers

Recently, Sun-Zhang have developed an algebraic theory for Kähler-Ricci shrinkers showing that they admit the structure of a polarized Fano fibration $(π: X \to Y, ξ)$. In particular, they conjecture that existence of a Kähler-Ricci shrinker metric is equivalent to a notion of K-stability. We prove one direction of this conjecture, namely that existence of a Kähler-Ricci shrinker metric $g$ implies K-polystability of $(π: X \to Y, ξ)$, in the case that the Ricci curvature of $g$ decays at infinity. As an application, we give a non-existence result: if $M$ is the blowup of a six-dimensional quadric along a two-dimensional subquadric, then the total space $X$ of the cube root of $K_M$ is a polarized Fano fibration not admitting a Kähler-Ricci shrinker.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

Observações sobre funções potenciais de variedades quase-Einstein não compactas

Neste artigo, estudamos o conjunto de funções potenciais em variedades quase Einstein não compactas. Mostramos que o espaço de todas as funções potenciais positivas em uma variedade tridimensional não compacta quase-Einstein tem dimensão no máximo dois, e que a igualdade vale se e somente se a variedade for isométrica a um produto $B\times\mathbb{R}$, onde $B$ é uma superfície $λ$-Einstein ou um dos exemplos obtidos por L. Berard Bergery e descritos no livro de Besse. Além disso, provamos que qualquer variedade quase-Einstein assintoticamente plana $n$-dimensional com $λ=0$ é necessariamente Ricci-plana.

math.DG↗