arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2407.06220

Exact enumeration of RNA secondary structures by helices and loops

Abstract

Enumerative studies of RNA secondary structures were initiated four decades ago by Waterman and his coworkers. Since then, RNA secondary structures have been explored according to many different structural characteristics, for instance, helices, components and loops by Hofacker, Schuster and Stadler, orders by Nebel, saturated structures by Clote, the $5^{\prime}$-$3^{\prime}$ end distance by Clote, Ponty and Steyaert, and the rainbow spectrum by Li and Reidys. However, the majority of the contributions are asymptotic results, and it is harder to derive explicit formulas. In this paper, we obtain exact formulas counting RNA secondary structures with a given number of helices as well as a given joint size distribution of helices and loops, while some related asymptotic results due to Hofacker, Schuster and Stadler have been known for about twenty years. Our approach is combinatorial, analyzing a recent bijection between RNA secondary structures and plane trees discovered by the first author and proposing a variation of Chen's bijective approach of counting trees by forests of simple trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ricky X. F. Chen, Christian M. Reidys, Michael S. Waterman. 2024-07-05. Exact enumeration of RNA secondary structures by helices and loops. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO