arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2407.04342

A $\frac{4}{3}$-Approximation for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence Problem in DAGs

Abstract

The Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence problem (MLSA) is defined as follows: Given a directed graph $G$ and a vertex $r\in V(G)$ from which every other vertex is reachable, find a spanning arborescence rooted at $r$ maximizing the number of leaves (vertices with out-degree zero). The MLSA has applications in broadcasting, where a message needs to be transferred from a source vertex to all other vertices along the arcs of an arborescence in a given network. In doing so, it is desirable to have as many vertices as possible that only need to receive, but not pass on messages since they are inherently cheaper to build. We study polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the MLSA. For general digraphs, the state-of-the-art is a $\min\{\sqrt{\mathrm{OPT}},92\}$-approximation. In the (still APX-hard) special case where the input graph is acyclic, the best known approximation guarantee of $\frac{7}{5}$ is due to Fernandes and Lintzmayer: They prove that any $α$-approximation for the \emph{hereditary $3$-set packing problem}, a special case of weighted $3$-set packing, yields a $\max\{\frac{4}{3},α\}$-approximation for the MLSA in acyclic digraphs (dags), and provide a $\frac{7}{5}$-approximation for the hereditary $3$-set packing problem. In this paper, we obtain a $\frac{4}{3}$-approximation for the hereditary $3$-set packing problem, and, thus, also for the MLSA in dags. In doing so, we manage to leverage the full potential of the reduction provided by Fernandes and Lintzmayer. The algorithm that we study is a simple local search procedure considering swaps of size up to $10$. Its analysis relies on a two-stage charging argument.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meike Neuwohner. 2024-07-05. A $\frac{4}{3}$-Approximation for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Arborescence Problem in DAGs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04342

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Online Flexible Busy Time Scheduling on Heterogeneous Machines

We study the online busy time scheduling model on heterogeneous machines. In our setting, jobs with uniform processing time arrive online with a deadline that becomes known to the algorithm at the job's arrival time. An algorithm has access to machines, each with different associated capacities and costs. The goal is to schedule jobs on machines by their deadline, so that the total cost incurred by the scheduling algorithm is minimized. While busy time scheduling has been well-studied, relatively little is known when machines are heterogeneous (i.e., have different costs and capacities), despite this natural theoretical generalization being the most practical model for clients using cloud computing services. We make significant progress in understanding this model by designing a deterministic online algorithm with competitive ratio 8(2p-1)/p < 16 when all jobs have uniform processing time p. A randomized version of this algorithm is 4(2p-1)/(p \ln 2)-competitive against an oblivious adversary. For unit-processing-time jobs, we give lower bounds of 4 and e (where e is Euler's number) on the competitive ratio of deterministic and randomized online algorithms, respectively. For unit-processing-time jobs with agreeable deadlines, we provide a deterministic 2-competitive online algorithm and a matching lower bound.

cs.DS

The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Counting

Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length $n$, where each $1$ corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. For fixed privacy parameters, the standard binary tree mechanism achieves expected $\ell_\infty$ error $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ under approximate differential privacy and $O(\log^2 n)$ under pure differential privacy. Whether these dependences on the stream length are necessary has remained a central open problem. For fixed $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(\log^{3/2} n)$ under approximate DP with sufficiently small fixed $δ>0$, and a lower bound of $Ω(\log^2 n)$ under pure DP. These bounds establish the optimality of the binary tree mechanism in both settings. The bounds hold for arbitrary mechanisms, even when the entire stream is available in advance. Both proofs use the same decomposition and accumulation of residual noise along a tree. As a consequence of the approximate-DP bound, we also obtain a largest-possible separation between hereditary discrepancy and private $\ell_\infty$ error for linear queries, showing that the known general upper bound in terms of hereditary discrepancy has the optimal dependence on the number of queries.

cs.DS

Directed Hamiltonian-Cycle Parity in $O^*((3/2)^n)$ Deterministic Time and Polynomial Space

We give a deterministic algorithm that computes the parity of the number of Hamiltonian cycles in an $n$-vertex directed graph in $O(n^4(3/2)^n)$ time and $O(n^2)$ bits of working space, improving the $O^*(φ^n)$ bound of Björklund and Husfeldt. Their local-degree formula reduces the problem to a weighted sum over solutions of structured quadratic equations. We cover the corresponding ternary state space by binary subcubes, each inducing an affine system. The Kuang--Wang cover can be regenerated within the target bound; canonical ownership resolves its overlaps, while self-loop conditional expectations bound every affine solution visit. Rollback elimination shares the work across cover prefixes. The same cover gives a Las Vegas algorithm listing all $L$ solutions of $m$ affine product constraints in $N$ Boolean variables in expected time $\operatorname{poly}(N,m)((3/2)^m+L)$ and polynomial space. Finally, we show that complete enumeration can require $Ω((3/2)^n)$ visits even on strongly connected digraphs after an optimal self-loop choice. This is a limitation of the enumeration method, not a general lower bound for Hamiltonian-cycle parity.

cs.DS