arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.04193

Combinatorial Constructions of Optimal Quaternary Additive Codes

Chaofeng Guan·Jingjie Lv·Gaojun Luo·Zhi Ma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper aims to construct optimal quaternary additive codes with non-integer dimensions. Firstly, we propose combinatorial constructions of quaternary additive constant-weight codes, alongside additive generalized anticode construction. Subsequently, we propose generalized Construction X, which facilitates the construction of non-integer dimensional optimal additive codes from linear codes. Then, we construct ten classes of optimal quaternary non-integer dimensional additive codes through these two methods. As an application, we also determine the optimal additive $[n,3.5,n-t]_4$ codes for all $t$ with variable $n$, except for $t=6,7,12$.

Explore related subjects

cs.ITmath.IT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chaofeng Guan, Jingjie Lv, Gaojun Luo, Zhi Ma. 2024-11-11. Combinatorial Constructions of Optimal Quaternary Additive Codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04193

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

When Relaxation Does Not Help: RLDCs with Small Soundness Yield LDCs

Locally decodable codes (LDCs) are error-correcting codes that allow recovery of any single message symbol by probing only a small number of positions from the (possibly corrupted) codeword. Relaxed locally decodable codes (RLDCs) further allow the decoder to output a special failure symbol $\bot$ on a corrupted codeword. While known constructions of RLDCs achieve much better parameters than standard LDCs, it is intriguing to understand the relationship between LDCs and RLDCs. On the one hand, separation results (i.e., the existence of $q$-query RLDCs that are not $q$-query LDCs) are known for $q=3$ (Gur, Minzer, Weissenberg, and Zheng, STOC 2026) and $q \geq 15$ (Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon, STOC 2026). On the other hand, prior work (Block, Blocki, Cheng, Grigorescu, Li, Zheng, and Zhu, CCC 2023) shows that any $2$-query RLDC also gives a $2$-query LDC, and Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) show that any \emph{linear} $3$-query RLDC is also a linear $3$-query LDC. Furthermore, Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) show that when the soundness error of a \emph{linear} $q$-query RLDC with perfect completeness is below some threshold $s(q)$, the code must also be a linear $q$-query LDC with comparable parameters. In this work, we extend the main result of Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) by removing the linearity requirement in the nonadaptive setting. Specifically, we show that every nonadaptive $(q,δ,1,s)$-RLDC over a finite alphabet $Σ$ with $s<|Σ|^{-q}$ yields a $q$-query LDC with comparable decoding radius and error. Our results also extend to the setting of locally correctable codes (LCCs) and relaxed locally correctable codes (RLCCs). From this, we also obtain lower bounds for nonadaptive RLDCs from known LDC lower bounds.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

A Mathematical Theory of Pragmatic Information

We propose a pragmatic information theory unifying communication, control, and decision-making. Its core is the isoteleia mapping, formalizing equifinality: distinct semantic paths leading to the same optimal action are pragmatically equivalent. This induces a three-tier hierarchy of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic information, each abstraction discarding task-irrelevant distinctions. We develop pragmatic entropy, up/down mutual information, channel capacity, and rate-distortion, and prove three coding theorems generalizing Shannon's classical results. We introduce pragmatic value (VoI) and cost (CoI) of information as decision-theoretic duals to rate-distortion and capacity, respectively, and formulate a Lagrangian dual framework for cross-layer optimization. The pragmatic efficiency bound $\mathcal{E}_p(\lambda)=\sup_R[\Phi_p(R)-\lambda\,\mathrm{CoI}_p(R)]$ quantifies the maximum net utility any resource-constrained intelligent system can extract, thereby establishing a fundamental behavioral capacity limit---generalizing Shannon's symbol-level capacity to goal-directed action. Extensions to continuous messages yield closed-form Gaussian expressions, while dynamic settings are addressed via a Bellman equation for sequential decision-making. This framework provides a rigorous foundation for task-oriented communication, networked control, autonomous systems, and embodied AI, shifting focus from symbol fidelity to the effectiveness of information in guiding actions, and offers a unified mathematical language for next-generation intelligent systems.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles

In several storage systems, including DNA storage and flash memory, errors affect neighbouring symbols jointly, and the Hamming metric does not adequately capture such error patterns. The symbol-pair read channel, introduced by Cassuto and Blaum~\cite{cassuto2011codes}, addresses this by reading consecutive pairs of symbols rather than individual symbols. Motivated by this, we introduce function-correcting symbol-pair codes with data protection (FCSPC-DP), which guarantee reliable recovery of a desired function of the message while simultaneously protecting the message itself against symbol-pair errors. We derive bounds on the optimal redundancy of such codes and establish a relationship with joint-pair distance matrices. We also give explicit constructions of FCSPC-DP for locally pair-bounded functions and symbol-pair weight functions. We introduce the pair-separation constant of a function, the minimum symbol-pair distance between messages sharing a function value, and show that when it is sufficiently large, data protection requires no additional redundancy: the optimal redundancy coincides with that of the corresponding code without data protection. Considering the symbol-pair analogue of the $α$-distance graph, we introduce two code invariants, the generation profile and the disconnection threshold, and use them to characterise a code's protection properties. Relating the two metrics through these invariants yields upper and lower bounds on the symbol-pair threshold in terms of its Hamming counterpart, both of which are attained. We further extend the classical Plotkin and sphere-packing bounds to this setting.

cs.IT↗