arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2406.10829

Solving Co-Path/Cycle Packing and Co-Path Packing Faster Than $3^k$

Abstract

The \textsc{Co-Path/Cycle Packing} problem (resp. The \textsc{Co-Path Packing} problem) asks whether we can delete at most $k$ vertices from the input graph such that the remaining graph is a collection of induced paths and cycles (resp. induced paths). These two problems are fundamental graph problems that have important applications in bioinformatics. Although these two problems have been extensively studied in parameterized algorithms, it seems hard to break the running time bound $3^k$. In 2015, Feng et al. provided an $O^*(3^k)$-time randomized algorithms for both of them. Recently, Tsur showed that they can be solved in $O^*(3^k)$ time deterministically. In this paper, by combining several techniques such as path decomposition, dynamic programming, cut \& count, and branch-and-search methods, we show that \textsc{Co-Path/Cycle Packing} can be solved in $O^*(2.8192^k)$ time deterministically and \textsc{Co-Path Packing} can be solved in $O^*(2.9241^{k})$ time with failure probability $\leq 1/3$. As a by-product, we also show that the \textsc{Co-Path Packing} problem can be solved in $O^*(5^p)$ time with probability at least 2/3 if a path decomposition of width $p$ is given.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuxi Liu, Mingyu Xiao. 2024-06-16. Solving Co-Path/Cycle Packing and Co-Path Packing Faster Than $3^k$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10829

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS