arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2406.10182

Goldblat-Thomason Theorems for Fundamental (Modal) Logic

Abstract

Holliday recently introduced a non-classical logic called Fundamental Logic, which intends to capture exactly those properties of the connectives "and", "or" and "not" that hold in virtue of their introduction and elimination rules in Fitch's natural deduction system for propositional logic. Holliday provides an intuitive relational semantics for fundamental logic which generalizes both Goldblatt's semantics for orthologic and Kripke semantics for intuitionistic logic. In this paper, we further the analysis of this semantics by providing a Goldblatt-Thomason theorem for Fundamental Logic. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions on a class K of fundamental frames for it to be axiomatic, i.e., to be the class of frames satisfying some logic extending Fundamental Logic. As a straightforward application of our main result, we also obtain a Goldblatt-Thomason theorem for Fundamental Modal Logic, which extends Fundamental Logic with standard Box and Diamond operators.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guillaume Massas. 2024-06-14. Goldblat-Thomason Theorems for Fundamental (Modal) Logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10182

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO