arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2406.04507

Explicit Combinatoric Structures of Palindromes and Chromatic Number of Restriction Graphs

Abstract

The palindromic fingerprint of a string $S[1\ldots n]$ is the set $PF(S) = \{(i,j)~|~ S[i\ldots j] \textit{ is a maximal }\\ \textit{palindrome substring of } S\}$. In this work, we consider the problem of string reconstruction from a palindromic fingerprint. That is, given an input set of pairs $PF \subseteq [1\ldots n] \times [1\ldots n]$ for an integer $n$, we wish to determine if $PF$ is a valid palindromic fingerprint for a string $S$, and if it is, output a string $S$ such that $PF= PF(S)$. I et al. [SPIRE2010] showed a linear reconstruction algorithm from a palindromic fingerprint that outputs the lexicographically smallest string over a minimum alphabet. They also presented an upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ for the maximal number of characters in the minimal alphabet. In this paper, we show tight combinatorial bounds for the palindromic fingerprint reconstruction problem. We present the string $S_k$, which is the shortest string whose fingerprint $PF(S_k)$ cannot be reconstructed using less than $k$ characters. The results additionally solve an open problem presented by I et al.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Amihood Amir, Michael Itzhaki. 2024-06-06. Explicit Combinatoric Structures of Palindromes and Chromatic Number of Restriction Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04507

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS