arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2405.18708

Cognitive Evolutionary Learning to Select Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems

Abstract

Feature interaction selection is a fundamental problem in commercial recommender systems. Most approaches equally enumerate all features and interactions by the same pre-defined operation under expert guidance. Their recommendation is unsatisfactory sometimes due to the following issues: (1)~They cannot ensure the learning abilities of models because their architectures are poorly adaptable to tasks and data; (2)~Useless features and interactions can bring unnecessary noise and complicate the training process. In this paper, we aim to adaptively evolve the model to select appropriate operations, features, and interactions under task guidance. Inspired by the evolution and functioning of natural organisms, we propose a novel \textsl{Cognitive EvoLutionary Learning (CELL)} framework, where cognitive ability refers to a property of organisms that allows them to react and survive in diverse environments. It consists of three stages, i.e., DNA search, genome search, and model functioning. Specifically, if we regard the relationship between models and tasks as the relationship between organisms and natural environments, interactions of feature pairs can be analogous to double-stranded DNA, of which relevant features and interactions can be analogous to genomes. Along this line, we diagnose the fitness of the model on operations, features, and interactions to simulate the survival rates of organisms for natural selection. We show that CELL can adaptively evolve into different models for different tasks and data, which enables practitioners to access off-the-shelf models. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that CELL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Also, we conduct synthetic experiments to ascertain that CELL can consistently discover the pre-defined interaction patterns for feature pairs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Runlong Yu, Qixiang Shao, Qi Liu, Huan Liu, Enhong Chen. 2024-05-29. Cognitive Evolutionary Learning to Select Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18708

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI