arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.14151

Active Learning at Scale: Investigating the Benefits of Peer Instruction in Undergraduate Mathematics

Raymond Vozzo·Stuart Johnson·Jonathan Tuke·Tanya Evans
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Active learning strategies have been widely recognised for their effectiveness in tertiary education, yet their implementation at scale, particularly in large first-year mathematics courses, presents considerable challenges. A common method for actively engaging students in large classes is through online quizzes, which may include structured peer instruction. In this study, we investigate the effect of having students answer quiz-style questions during class both with and without peer discussion in a first-year large mathematics course (N = 550). We also investigate the short- and long-term effects of each protocol. Our findings indicate that peer instruction enhances student performance in mathematics in the following ways: First, when the responses to questions were measured before and after peer instruction the proportion of questions answered correctly increased by 0.2; second, when correct responses were compared to similar questions the following week the proportion correct increased by 0.34 (compared to 0.07 for the control); finally, when measured at the end of the semester the proportion of questions answered correctly increased by 0.42 (compared to 0.2 for the control). These results align with and build upon previous research on the benefits of peer instruction, indicating a potential long-term association with student knowledge retention of mathematical concepts. This suggests that peer discussion may do more than momentarily improve accuracy -- it could also contribute to more durable learning.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raymond Vozzo, Stuart Johnson, Jonathan Tuke, Tanya Evans. 2024-05-23. Active Learning at Scale: Investigating the Benefits of Peer Instruction in Undergraduate Mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14151

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗