arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.10556

Parameterized Complexity of Dominating Set Variants in Almost Cluster and Split Graphs

Dishant Goyal·Ashwin Jacob·Kaushtubh Kumar·Diptapriyo Majumdar·Venkatesh Raman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider structural parameterizations of the fundamental Dominating Set problem and its variants in the parameter ecology program. We give improved FPT algorithms and lower bounds under well-known conjectures for dominating set in graphs that are k vertices away from a cluster graph or a split graph. These are graphs in which there is a set of k vertices (called the modulator) whose deletion results in a cluster graph or a split graph. We also call k as the deletion distance (to the appropriate class of graphs). When parameterized by the deletion distance k to cluster graphs - we can find a minimum dominating set (DS) in 3^k n^{O(1)}-time. Within the same time, we can also find a minimum independent dominating set (IDS) or a minimum dominating clique (DC) or a minimum efficient dominating set (EDS) or a minimum total dominating set (TDS). We also show that most of these variants of dominating set do not have polynomial sized kernel. Additionally, we show that when parameterized by the deletion distance k to split graphs - IDS can be solved in 2^k n^{O(1)}-time and EDS can be solved in 3^{k/2}n^{O(1)}.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dishant Goyal, Ashwin Jacob, Kaushtubh Kumar, Diptapriyo Majumdar, Venkatesh Raman. 2024-05-17. Parameterized Complexity of Dominating Set Variants in Almost Cluster and Split Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10556

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗