arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2403.12224

On the (Local) Lifting Property

Abstract

The (Local) Lifting Property ((L)LP) is introduced by Kirchberg and deals with lifting completely positive maps. We give a characterization of the (L)LP in terms of lifting $\ast$-homomorphisms. We use it to prove that if $A$ and $B$ have the LP and $F$ is their finite-dimensional C*-subalgebra, then $A\ast_F B$ has the LP. This answers a question of Ozawa. We prove that Exel's soft tori have the LP. As a consequence we obtain that $C^*(F_n\times F_n)$ is inductive limit of RFD C*-algebras with the LP. We prove that for a class of C*-algebras including $C^*(F_n\times F_n)$, all contractible C*-algebras and all suspensions, the LLP is equivalent to Ext being a group. As byproduct of methods developed in the paper we generalize Kirchberg's theorem about extensions with the WEP, give short proofs of several, old and new, facts about soft tori, new unified proofs of Li and Shen's characterization of RFD property of free products amalgamated over a finite-dimensional subalgebra and Blackadar's characterization of semiprojectivity of them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dominic Enders, Tatiana Shulman. 2026-05-21. On the (Local) Lifting Property. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Set-theoretic absoluteness for analysts and separable \cstar-algebras without Choice

Basic theory of separable C*-algebras can be developed without the Axiom of Choice, and it does not depend on the Continuum Hypothesis, Martin's Axiom, and other standard set-theoretic assumptions. This can be proved in two ways. First, by showing that the standard proofs do not require Choice. Second, by utilizing set-theoretic absoluteness theorems. We provide an introduction to projective complexity and absoluteness for analysts. We also give some limiting examples consistent with ZF, such as a commutative \cstar-algebra concretely represented on a Hilbert space but not isomorphic to $C(X)$ for any compact Hausdorff space $X$ and whose state space is not compact and has no extreme points.

math.OA

Schur Multipliers with Unequal Operator and Completely Bounded Norms on $S_p$, $1<p\ne 2<\infty $

For every $1<p\neq2<\infty$, we exhibit an explicit Schur multiplier on $S_p$ whose operator norm is strictly smaller than its completely bounded norm. More precisely, for each such $p$, we construct a finitely supported Schur symbol $m_p$ such that \[ \|M_{m_p}\|_{p\to p} < \|M_{m_p}\|_{\mathrm{cb},p}. \] This answers the question raised by Lafforgue and de la Salle in 2011 after their Conjecture~1.8 and gives an affirmative answer to Statement~2 in Section~5 of Caspers and Wildschut (2019). In particular, it disproves Statement~3 of Caspers and Wildschut (2019) throughout the same range of exponents.

math.OA

Stationary states on a $C^*$-algebra for an inner action

We study stationary states for actions of countable discrete groups on unital separable $C^*$-algebras. We prove that the stationary state space associated with an inner action of a subgroup of the unitary group that generates the algebra is a Choquet simplex. We also give a locality criterion covering Bernoulli shifts. The simplex structure yields a canonical decomposition of stationary states into tracial and purely nontracial parts. For inner actions, we characterize extreme stationary states by factoriality of their GNS von Neumann algebras. We further show that a stationary state is tracial if and only if its GNS von Neumann algebra is finite, and that it is purely nontracial if and only if this algebra is of type~$\mathrm{III}$. As applications, for $2\leq d\leq\infty$ the stationary state simplex of $C^*(\mathbb{F}_d)$ has a Poulsen face, while for a nontrivial property~$(T)$ group the stationary state simplex of $C^*(Γ)$ is not Poulsen. Finally, we give a sufficient spectral-gap condition for $S_μ(A)$ to be a Bauer simplex and construct a family $(A_d,Γ_d,μ_d)$ satisfying this condition.

math.OA