arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.08802

Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies

Johannes Schneider·Rene Abraham·Christian Meske
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) like ChatGPT has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Limited research addresses organizational governance from both technical and business perspectives. This gap is particularly relevant for international businesses, where differences in regulation, language, and business environments complicate governance. While multiple frameworks for AI governance exist, this needed diversity is lacking for GenAI. This review paper fills this gap by surveying recent literature to better understand the fundamental characteristics of GenAI and to adapt existing governance frameworks specifically to GenAI. The resulting framework delineates scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms designed to both harness business opportunities and mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. We theorize a distinctive property of GenAI governance: its scope is endogenous to use. Unlike conventional organizational AI, for which governance is organized around a fixed artifact (e.g., model, intended use), GenAI allows users to reconfigure the artifact (e.g., its behavior and risk). Consequently, the object of governance is not fixed ex ante but is partly constituted through use.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Schneider, Rene Abraham, Christian Meske. 2026-09-05. Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CY subjectcs.LG subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Can machines think efficiently?

The Turing Test is no longer adequate for distinguishing human and machine intelligence. With advanced artificial intelligence systems already passing the original Turing Test and contributing to serious ethical and environmental concerns, we urgently need to update the test. This work expands upon the original imitation game by accounting for an additional factor: the energy spent answering the questions. By adding the constraint of energy, the new test forces us to evaluate intelligence through the lens of efficiency, connecting the abstract problem of thinking to the concrete reality of finite resources. Further, this proposed new test ensures the evaluation of intelligence has a measurable, practical finish line that the original test lacks. This additional constraint compels society to weigh the time savings of using artificial intelligence against its total resource cost.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

FlavourBench: Executable Culinary Reward Maps for Language Model Evaluation and Post-Training

We introduce FlavorBench: a benchmark for Compiling Dense Deterministic Answer Maps from a Versioned Culinary Embeddings Model. We test 27 frontier large language model endpoints on 534 substitution, pairing and constraining tasks for tasks that request a 3-ingredient portfolio from 8 candidates and score all 56 resulting portfolios. We conducted multiplicity-controlled paired tests on 101 of 351 model contrasts for this task-set. The largest point estimate on this task-set was achieved by Grok 4.6 at 65.1. The same rankings for this task-set were also achieved on several independently-compiled panels (using a variety of familiar metrics, task filters, etc.) and 3 public Epicure checkpoints. We present a 3-seed post-training study where LoRA SFT of a Qwen3-0.6B checkpoint on 270 optimal answers for Epicure to score on this task-set resulted in a 13.3 point gain on 84 anchor-disjoint maps (compared to format and label-matched control; 95% CI: 6.52, 20.29; p = 0.000170).

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

CompanionSim: Synthetic Data for Evaluating Anthropomorphism in Human-AI Relationships

Many people now see AI systems as not just productivity tools but as social companions. Researchers are eager to study the consequences of AI companionship behaviors, such as validation, which evoke trust, empathy, and attachment in human-human interaction. However, human-AI interaction data is limited and unreliable, slowing research progress. We scale small amounts of real-world data by simulating multi-turn human-chatbot dialogue across a range of chatbot behaviors and use cases. We release CompanionSim: a simulation framework with 2,240 simulated human-chatbot conversations representing 16 chatbot behaviors across seven use cases. Human participants annotated the simulated conversations and real-world conversations in two experiments probing perceptions of companionship behaviors. We conducted Study 1 with a U.S. representative sample ($N_{1}~=~628$) and Study 2 across the U.S., U.K., India, and Nigeria ($N_{2}~=~3,646$). Surprisingly, we find that companionship behaviors reduced likability, humanlikeness, and trust in AI chatbots. These effects were larger in particular subgroups: women and older participants saw companionship chatbots as less likable, humanlike, and trustworthy. We encourage researchers to leverage real-world and synthetic data together to study the differential impacts of AI companions and to create benchmark evaluations of AI chatbots.

cs.CY↗