arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2403.08359

Assessment of background noise properties in time and time-frequency domains in the context of vibration-based local damage detection in real environment

Abstract

Any measurement in condition monitoring applications is associated with disturbing noise. Till now, most of the diagnostic procedures have assumed the Gaussian distribution for the noise. This paper shares a novel perspective to the problem of local damage detection. The acquired vector of observations is considered as an additive mixture of signal of interest (SOI) and noise with strongly non-Gaussian, heavy-tailed properties, that masks the SOI. The distribution properties of the background noise influence the selection of tools used for the signal analysis, particularly for local damage detection. Thus, it is extremely important to recognize and identify possible non-Gaussian behavior of the noise. The problem considered here is more general than the classical goodness-of-fit testing. The paper highlights the important role of variance, as most of the methods for signal analysis are based on the assumption of the finite-variance distribution of the underlying signal. The finite variance assumption is crucial but implicit to most indicators used in condition monitoring, (such as the root-mean-square value, the power spectral density, the kurtosis, the spectral correlation, etc.), in view that infinite variance implies moments higher than 2 are also infinite. The problem is demonstrated based on three popular types of non-Gaussian distributions observed for real vibration signals. We demonstrate how the properties of noise distribution in the time domain may change by its transformations to the time-frequency domain (spectrogram). Additionally, we propose a procedure to check the presence of the infinite-variance of the background noise. Our investigations are illustrated using simulation studies and real vibration signals from various machines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Katarzyna Skowronek, Tomasz Barszcz, Jerome Antoni, Radosław Zimroz, Agnieszka Wyłomańska. 2024-03-13. Assessment of background noise properties in time and time-frequency domains in the context of vibration-based local damage detection in real environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110465

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME