arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2403.02572

Fill Probabilities in a Limit Order Book with State-Dependent Stochastic Order Flows

Abstract

This paper studies the fill probabilities of limit orders placed at different price levels in a limit order book. These probabilities play a central role in execution optimization, as limit orders are not guaranteed to be executed and inherently involve a trade-off between execution cost and execution risk. We model the limit order book within a general state-dependent stochastic framework, representing its dynamics as a collection of interacting queuing systems while incorporating key stylized market features. Within this framework, we derive semi-analytical expressions for several quantities of interest under state-dependent order flows, including the probability of a mid-price change, the fill probabilities of orders placed at the best quotes, and those of orders placed deeper in the book before the opposite best quote moves. While the framework can be extended to even deeper price levels, the corresponding fill probabilities are typically negligible. We validate the proposed model through extensive numerical experiments using real foreign exchange spot market data. The results demonstrate that the model remains tractable while capturing essential order book dynamics, and that the derived expressions achieve good accuracy in estimating fill probabilities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Felix Lokin, Fenghui Yu. 2024-03-05. Fill Probabilities in a Limit Order Book with State-Dependent Stochastic Order Flows. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deep Learning of Robust Market Making under Regime-Switching Order Flow

Classical market-making strategies based on stochastic control, such as the Avellaneda-Stoikov and the Gu\'{e}ant-Lehalle-Fernandez-Tapia (GLFT) extension, provide closed-form quoting rules, but rest on assumptions that break down at realistic microstructure timescales. One of them is that order flow is stationary, while empirical evidence points to the existence of regimes, possibly associated with algorithmic execution of metaorders. In this case, existing methods provide negative PnL. In this paper, we develop a deep reinforcement-learning market maker (RLMM) - a Rainbow-style distributional DQN (C51) which is calibrated and tested in a zero-intelligence limit order book. We find that, in the stationary setting, RLMM outperforms GLFT across the entire observed risk-return frontier. The RLMM is more robust to flow asymmetry than GLFT, but, like any stationarily trained strategy, it still suffers large drawdowns from inventory saturation under persistent directional imbalance. Augmenting the state of RLMM with two auxiliary signals - a Bayesian online change-point filter over the directional flow bias and a queue-adjusted quote-exposure imbalance -restores profitability. A final scenario-bandit step that reweights low-return regime scenarios further improves performance under random-persistence and correlated-direction stress.

q-fin.TR

dexamine: A Python package for Uniswap event data on Ethereum

Decentralized exchanges record trading and liquidity provision on public blockchains, but empirical analysis requires interpreting these records and linking them to execution metadata. dexamine is a Python package that parses Uniswap v2 and v3 events on Ethereum. It converts transaction receipt logs into observations of trades and liquidity changes, with token quantities, pool state, transaction order, and gas information. The package separates data retrieval, contract metadata, protocol interpretation, and output construction. The repository provides recorded Ethereum responses and an offline reproducible example, and version 1 has been used to construct data for an empirical study of price discovery in decentralized markets.

q-fin.TR

The Double-Edged Sword of Short-Selling Bans

We develop a theoretical model that endogenizes the regulator's decision to impose short-selling bans to prevent large stock price declines. Empirically, we test the model's predictions using the cross-sectional variation in short-selling restrictions implemented across European countries in 2020. Consistent with our model, we find that bans had a detrimental effect on liquidity and failed to support the average price levels, but were effective in limiting large price drawdowns. Finally, we show that the effectiveness of the bans depends on the share of informed stockholders, a central variable in our framework, thus informing the design of more effective regulatory responses.

q-fin.TR