arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.02212

Constraint Satisfaction Problems with Advice

Suprovat Ghoshal·Konstantin Makarychev·Yury Makarychev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We initiate the study of algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems with ML oracle advice. We introduce two models of advice and then design approximation algorithms for Max Cut, Max $2$-Lin, and Max $3$-Lin in these models. In particular, we show the following. 1. For Max-Cut and Max $2$-Lin, we design an algorithm that yields near-optimal solutions when the average degree is larger than a threshold degree, which only depends on the amount of advice and is independent of the instance size. We also give an algorithm for nearly satisfiable Max $3$-Lin instances with quantitatively similar guarantees. 2. Further, we provide impossibility results for algorithms in these models. In particular, under standard complexity assumptions, we show that Max $3$-Lin is still $1/2 + \eta$ hard to approximate given access to advice, when there are no assumptions on the instance degree distribution. Additionally, we also show that Max $4$-Lin is $1/2 + \eta$ hard to approximate even when the average degree of the instance is linear in the number of variables.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Suprovat Ghoshal, Konstantin Makarychev, Yury Makarychev. 2024-03-04. Constraint Satisfaction Problems with Advice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗