Contract Design Beyond Hidden-Actions

Tomer Ezra; Stefano Leonardi; Matteo Russo

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.16553

Contract Design Beyond Hidden-Actions

Tomer Ezra·Stefano Leonardi·Matteo Russo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the classical principal-agent hidden-action contract model, a principal delegates the execution of a costly task to an agent. In order to complete the task, the agent chooses an action from a set of actions, where each potential action is associated with a cost and a success probability to accomplish the task. To incentivize the agent to exert effort, the principal can commit to a contract, which is the amount of payment based on the task's success but not on the hidden-action chosen by the agent. In this work, we study the contract design framework under binary outcomes where we relax the hidden-action assumption. We introduce new models where the principal is allowed to inspect subsets of actions at some cost that depends on the inspected subset. If the principal discovers that the agent did not select the agreed-upon action through the inspection, the principal can withhold payment. This relaxation of the model introduces a broader strategy space for the principal, who now faces a tradeoff between positive incentives (increasing payment) and negative incentives (increasing inspection). We devise algorithms for finding the best deterministic and randomized incentive-compatible inspection schemes for various assumptions on the inspection cost function. In particular, we show the tractability of the case of submodular inspection cost functions. We complement our results by showing that it is impossible to efficiently find the optimal randomized inspection scheme for the more general case of XOS inspection cost functions, and that there is no PTAS for the case of subadditive inspection cost functions.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Tomer Ezra, Stefano Leonardi, Matteo Russo. 2024-02-26. Contract Design Beyond Hidden-Actions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16553

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗