arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2402.03459

Hybrid Smoothing for Anomaly Detection in Time Series

Abstract

Many industrial and engineering processes monitored as times series have smooth trends that indicate normal behavior and occasionally anomalous patterns that can indicate a problem. This kind of behavior can be modeled by a smooth trend, such as a spline or Gaussian process, and a disruption based on a sparser representation. Our approach is to expand the process signal into two sets of basis functions: one set uses L2 penalties on the coefficients, and the other set uses L1 penalties to control sparsity. From a frequentist perspective, this results in a hybrid smoother that combines cubic smoothing splines and the LASSO. As a Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), this is equivalent to priors giving a Gaussian process and a Laplace distribution for anomaly coefficients. For the hybrid smoother, we propose two new ways of determining the penalty parameters that use effective degrees of freedom and contrast this with the BHM that uses loosely informative inverse gamma priors. Several reformulations are used to make sampling the BHM posterior more efficient, including some novel features in orthogonalizing and regularizing the model basis functions. This methodology is motivated by a substantive application, offline monitoring of a water treatment process for municipal water filtration. We also test the robustness of these methods with a Monte Carlo study designed to inspect a range trended time series under an array of conditions and compare this new approach to multiple existing modern methods. Both the hybrid smoother and the full BHM give comparable results with small false positive and false negative rates. Besides being successful in the water treatment application, this work can be easily extended to other Gaussian process models and other features that represent process disruptions in offline data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Hofkes, Douglas Nychka, Tzahi Cath, Amanda Hering, Craig McGonagill. 2024-02-05. Hybrid Smoothing for Anomaly Detection in Time Series. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03459

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME