arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.01816

Simple Symmetric Sustainable Sorting -- the greeNsort article

Jens Oehlschlägel
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We explored an uncharted part of the solution space for sorting algorithms: the role of symmetry in divide&conquer algorithms. We found/designed novel simple binary Quicksort and Mergesort algorithms operating in contiguous space which achieve improved trade-offs between worst-case CPU-efficiency, best-case adaptivity and RAM-requirements. The 'greeNsort' algorithms need less hardware (RAM) and/or less energy (CPU) compared to the prior art. The new algorithms fit a theoretical framework: 'Footprint' KPIs allow to compare algorithms with different RAM-requirements, a new 'definition' of sorting API-targets simplifies construction of stable algorithms with mirrored scan directions, and our ordinal machine model encourages robust algorithms that minimize access 'distance'. Unlike earlier 'Quicksorts', our 'Zacksort', 'Zucksort' and 'Ducksort' algorithms optimally marry CPU-efficiency and tie-adaptivity. Unlike earlier 'Mergesorts' which required 100% distant buffer, our 'Frogsort' and 'Geckosort' algorithms achieve similar CPU-efficiency with 50% or less local buffer. Unlike natural Mergesorts such as 'Timsort' which are optimized for the best case of full-presorting, our 'Octosort' and 'Squidsort' algorithms achieve excellent bi-adaptivity to presorted best-cases without sacrificing worst-case efficiency in real sorting tasks. Our 'Walksort' and 'Jumpsort' have lower Footprint than the impressive low-memory 'Grailsort' and 'Sqrtsort' of Astrelin. Given the current climate-emergency, this is a call to action for all maintainers of sorting libraries, all software-engineers using custom sorting code, all professors teaching algorithms, all IT professionals designing programming languages, compilers and CPUs: check for better algorithms and consider symmetric code-mirroring.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CYcs.DCcs.PF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jens Oehlschlägel. 2024-02-02. Simple Symmetric Sustainable Sorting -- the greeNsort article. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗