Separating $k$-Median from the Supplier Version

Aditya Anand; Euiwoong Lee

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2401.13819

Separating $k$-Median from the Supplier Version

Aditya Anand·Euiwoong Lee

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a metric space $(V, d)$ along with an integer $k$, the $k$-Median problem asks to open $k$ centers $C \subseteq V$ to minimize $\sum_{v \in V} d(v, C)$, where $d(v, C) := \min_{c \in C} d(v, c)$. While the best-known approximation ratio of $2.613$ holds for the more general supplier version where an additional set $F \subseteq V$ is given with the restriction $C \subseteq F$, the best known hardness for these two versions are $1+1/e \approx 1.36$ and $1+2/e \approx 1.73$ respectively, using the same reduction from Max $k$-Coverage. We prove the following two results separating them. First, we show a $1.546$-parameterized approximation algorithm that runs in time $f(k) n^{O(1)}$. Since $1+2/e$ is proved to be the optimal approximation ratio for the supplier version in the parameterized setting, this result separates the original $k$-Median from the supplier version. Next, we prove a $1.416$-hardness for polynomial-time algorithms assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. This is achieved via a new fine-grained hardness of Max-$k$-Coverage for small set sizes. Our upper bound and lower bound are derived from almost the same expression, with the only difference coming from the well-known separation between the powers of LP and SDP on (hypergraph) vertex cover.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Aditya Anand, Euiwoong Lee. 2024-01-24. Separating $k$-Median from the Supplier Version. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13819

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗