arXiv · 2401.05313
A Comparison of Star-Formation Histories Derived from UniverseMachine and LEGA-C at $0.6 < z < 1$
Abstract
In this work, we compare star formation histories of massive (10.5 $< \log(\mathrm{M_*/M_{\odot}}) <$ 12) galaxies in the UniverseMachine model to those measured from the Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C) at $0.6<z<1$. Following the LEGA-C study, we investigate how 50% ($t_{50}$) and 90% ($t_{90}$) formation timescales depend on total stellar mass. We find good agreement between the observed and model timescales for the star-forming population $\Delta\,t_{SF}\lesssim1\,\mathrm{Gyr}$ across the full mass range. In contrast, the observed age-mass correlation is weaker for the quiescent population compared to UniverseMachine models ($\Delta t_{Q}\lesssim2\,\mathrm{Gyr}$), especially at the high-mass end. This indicates continued star formation or additional processes in the most massive quiescent galaxies, a behavior not accounted for in the UniverseMachine model.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Cecilia Steel, Alan Pearl, Yasha Kaushal, Rachel Bezanson. 2024-01-10. A Comparison of Star-Formation Histories Derived from UniverseMachine and LEGA-C at $0.6 < z < 1$. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172%2Fad1be9
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.