arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2312.12555

A note on $\mathbb{G}_a$-actions in positive characteristic

Abstract

Miyanishi proved that the ring of invariants of any $\mathbb{G}_a$ action on $\mathbb{A}^3$ is $\mathbb{A}^2$, when the field $k$ has zero characteristic. However, it is not known if this result holds when $k$ has positive characteristic. We provide a sufficient condition under which this result holds in positive characteristic. We also prove the following results related to the rigidity of the ring of invariants of an exponential map of a polynomial ring. (1) Let $B=R^{[n]}$, where $R$ is a $k$-domain and $δ\in \mathrm{EXP}_R(B)$ is a triangular exponential map. Then $B^δ$ is non-rigid. In particular, for any field $k$ of zero characteristic the kernel of any triangular $R$-derivation of $R^{[n]}$ is non-rigid. (2) Let $k$ be a field of zero characteristic and $R$ be a $k$-domain. Then the kernel of any linear locally nilpotent $R$-derivation of $R^{[n]}$ is non-rigid. When $k$ is an algebraically closed of zero characteristic, the commuting derivations conjecture for $k^{[3]}$ has been proved by Maubach and El Kahoui proved that the weak Abhyankar Sathaye conjecture is equivalent to the commuting derivations conjecture. By introducing the notion of commuting exponential maps and formulating the commuting exponential maps conjecture, we show that the weak Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture is equivalent to the commuting exponential maps conjecture for any field of arbitrary characteristic. In particular, we prove the commuting derivations conjecture$(CD(3))$ for any field of zero characteristic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P M S Sai Krishna. 2025-10-25. A note on $\mathbb{G}_a$-actions in positive characteristic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12555

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On triviality of $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action

T. Kambayashi had shown that $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over separable field extensions are necessarily polynomial rings. However, there exist inseparable $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms which are not necessarily polynomial rings. In this paper, we give a structure theorem for $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over arbitrary field extensions admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action. From this structure theorem we derive some conditions under which an $\mathbb{A}^2$-form becomes trivial. In particular, we prove that over a field $k$, a factorial $\mathbb{A}^2$-form having a $k$-rational point and a non-trivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action is trivial and we also give examples demonstrating that none of these hypotheses can be discarded. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we obtain a generalization of the Zariski Cancellation Theorem for the affine plane over an arbitrary field.

math.AC

Symbolic powers of the ideal of$n$ general points in $P^{n-1}$

Problem L of Fröberg--Lundqvist--Oneto--Shapiro asks for the difference between the Hilbert series of ordinary and symbolic powers of the ideal of general points in projective space. We solve this completely for \(n\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\). Besides a closed formula for \[ \HS(S/I^m)-\HS(S/I^{(m)}), \] we determine all minimal monomial generators of \(I^{(m)}\), and describe the symbolic Rees algebra. We also show that containment \(I^{(m)}\subseteq I^r\) is detected solely by initial degrees. This gives the exact containment threshold, the Waldschmidt constant \(\walpha\), the resurgence \(\Res\), and the asymptotic resurgence \(\aRes\): \[ \walpha(I)=\frac{n}{n-1}, \qquad \Res(I)=\aRes(I)=\frac{2(n-1)}{n}. \] We also take the first step beyond \(n\) points: for \(n+1\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\) --- again a rigid, non-monomial configuration --- we identify the defining quadrics, resolve the case \(n=3\) completely (a complete intersection, with \(J^{(m)}=J^m\) for all \(m\) and resurgence \(1\)), and propose an exact Waldschmidt-constant formula \(\walpha=\frac{n+1}{n-1}\) for all \(n\), verified computationally in every case we could check.

math.AC