arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.09733

Quantum-centric Supercomputing for Materials Science: A Perspective on Challenges and Future Directions

Yuri Alexeev·Maximilian Amsler·Paul Baity·Marco Antonio Barroca·Sanzio Bassini·Torey Battelle·Daan Camps·David Casanova·Young Jai Choi·Frederic T. Chong·Charles Chung·Chris Codella·Antonio D. Corcoles·James Cruise·Alberto Di Meglio·Jonathan Dubois·Ivan Duran·Thomas Eckl·Sophia Economou·Stephan Eidenbenz·Bruce Elmegreen·Clyde Fare·Ismael Faro·Cristina Sanz Fernández·Rodrigo Neumann Barros Ferreira·Keisuke Fuji·Bryce Fuller·Laura Gagliardi·Giulia Galli·Jennifer R. Glick·Isacco Gobbi·Pranav Gokhale·Salvador de la Puente Gonzalez·Johannes Greiner·Bill Gropp·Michele Grossi·Emanuel Gull·Burns Healy·Benchen Huang·Travis S. Humble·Nobuyasu Ito·Artur F. Izmaylov·Ali Javadi-Abhari·Douglas Jennewein·Shantenu Jha·Liang Jiang·Barbara Jones·Wibe Albert de Jong·Petar Jurcevic·William Kirby·Stefan Kister·Masahiro Kitagawa·Joel Klassen·Katherine Klymko·Kwangwon Koh·Masaaki Kondo·Doga Murat Kurkcuoglu·Krzysztof Kurowski·Teodoro Laino·Ryan Landfield·Matt Leininger·Vicente Leyton-Ortega·Ang Li·Meifeng Lin·Junyu Liu·Nicolas Lorente·Andre Luckow·Simon Martiel·Francisco Martin-Fernandez·Margaret Martonosi·Claire Marvinney·Arcesio Castaneda Medina·Dirk Merten·Antonio Mezzacapo·Kristel Michielsen·Abhishek Mitra·Tushar Mittal·Kyungsun Moon·Joel Moore·Mario Motta·Young-Hye Na·Yunseong Nam·Prineha Narang·Yu-ya Ohnishi·Daniele Ottaviani·Matthew Otten·Scott Pakin·Vincent R. Pascuzzi·Ed Penault·Tomasz Piontek·Jed Pitera·Patrick Rall·Gokul Subramanian Ravi·Niall Robertson·Matteo Rossi·Piotr Rydlichowski·Hoon Ryu·Georgy Samsonidze·Mitsuhisa Sato·Nishant Saurabh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Computational models are an essential tool for the design, characterization, and discovery of novel materials. Hard computational tasks in materials science stretch the limits of existing high-performance supercomputing centers, consuming much of their simulation, analysis, and data resources. Quantum computing, on the other hand, is an emerging technology with the potential to accelerate many of the computational tasks needed for materials science. In order to do that, the quantum technology must interact with conventional high-performance computing in several ways: approximate results validation, identification of hard problems, and synergies in quantum-centric supercomputing. In this paper, we provide a perspective on how quantum-centric supercomputing can help address critical computational problems in materials science, the challenges to face in order to solve representative use cases, and new suggested directions.

Explore related subjects

quant-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuri Alexeev, Maximilian Amsler, Paul Baity, Marco Antonio Barroca, Sanzio Bassini, Torey Battelle, Daan Camps, David Casanova, Young Jai Choi, Frederic T. Chong, Charles Chung, Chris Codella, Antonio D. Corcoles, James Cruise, Alberto Di Meglio, Jonathan Dubois, Ivan Duran, Thomas Eckl, Sophia Economou, Stephan Eidenbenz, Bruce Elmegreen, Clyde Fare, Ismael Faro, Cristina Sanz Fernández, Rodrigo Neumann Barros Ferreira, Keisuke Fuji, Bryce Fuller, Laura Gagliardi, Giulia Galli, Jennifer R. Glick, Isacco Gobbi, Pranav Gokhale, Salvador de la Puente Gonzalez, Johannes Greiner, Bill Gropp, Michele Grossi, Emanuel Gull, Burns Healy, Benchen Huang, Travis S. Humble, Nobuyasu Ito, Artur F. Izmaylov, Ali Javadi-Abhari, Douglas Jennewein, Shantenu Jha, Liang Jiang, Barbara Jones, Wibe Albert de Jong, Petar Jurcevic, William Kirby, Stefan Kister, Masahiro Kitagawa, Joel Klassen, Katherine Klymko, Kwangwon Koh, Masaaki Kondo, Doga Murat Kurkcuoglu, Krzysztof Kurowski, Teodoro Laino, Ryan Landfield, Matt Leininger, Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Ang Li, Meifeng Lin, Junyu Liu, Nicolas Lorente, Andre Luckow, Simon Martiel, Francisco Martin-Fernandez, Margaret Martonosi, Claire Marvinney, Arcesio Castaneda Medina, Dirk Merten, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristel Michielsen, Abhishek Mitra, Tushar Mittal, Kyungsun Moon, Joel Moore, Mario Motta, Young-Hye Na, Yunseong Nam, Prineha Narang, Yu-ya Ohnishi, Daniele Ottaviani, Matthew Otten, Scott Pakin, Vincent R. Pascuzzi, Ed Penault, Tomasz Piontek, Jed Pitera, Patrick Rall, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Niall Robertson, Matteo Rossi, Piotr Rydlichowski, Hoon Ryu, Georgy Samsonidze, Mitsuhisa Sato, Nishant Saurabh. 2023-12-14. Quantum-centric Supercomputing for Materials Science: A Perspective on Challenges and Future Directions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.04.060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Probing the Error-Mitigation Threshold with Matrix Product States

Quantum error mitigation relies on accurate noise characterization, but mismatches between the actual and characterized noise can be amplified and drive a sharp threshold between successful and failed mitigation. In random circuits, this threshold maps onto a random-field Ising transition, but previous exact numerics were limited to small one-dimensional and all-to-all systems, leaving explicit two-dimensional architectures unresolved. We develop a fixed-bond-dimension matrix-product-state method for the replicated transfer dynamics that extends threshold calculations beyond exact propagation while retaining the finite-size signatures of the transition. At system sizes beyond previous exact studies, we recover the predicted absence of a threshold for quenched disorder in 1D, obtain a sharper annealed all-to-all critical point, and resolve architecture-dependent finite-depth thresholds in 2D square and heavy-hex circuits. These results establish replicated tensor-network dynamics as a practical tool for probing error-mitigation thresholds in large and higher-dimensional noisy circuits.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing

The execution of useful quantum algorithms on fault-tolerant processors requires more than a mapping from logical gates to encoded operations: the spatial organization, non-Clifford resource supply, and execution schedule must also be determined while keeping physical overhead within practical limits. Although the theoretical hierarchy from logical circuits to fault-tolerant operations is well established, these implementation choices are often specified and optimized separately. Here we develop a low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing. From hierarchical algorithm descriptions, it constructs dependency-preserving logical schedules and an executable workload capturing logical interactions, operation parallelism, and time-resolved non-Clifford demand, thereby linking logical computation to surface-code organization, resource-state preparation, and fault-tolerant execution in a traceable workflow. We apply the framework to twenty benchmark circuits across seven algorithm families and a hierarchically composed application-scale elliptic-curve discrete-logarithm workload. Physical costs vary substantially even for circuits with similar logical resource counts. Under our direct-rotation calibration, non-Clifford implementation selection reduces space-time volume by up to 241.5 times versus an all-synthesis baseline for the QAOA amplitude-amplification workload. Circuit-specific surface-code layouts reduce routed-latency estimates for all twenty benchmarks; thirteen also reduce space-time volume because communication savings outweigh added spatial overhead. These results show that low-cost fault-tolerant execution depends on computation scheduling and organization, not aggregate logical resource counts alone.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states

It is well-known that learning a pure $n$-qubit stabilizer state $|\psi\rangle$ both requires, and can be accomplished with, access to a number of copies of $|\psi\rangle$ linear in $n$. However, the precise constant coefficient of this scaling does not appear to have been determined. Here we prove that $L_\delta(n)$, the smallest number of copies from which a quantum procedure can identify any stabilizer state with failure probability at most $0<\delta<1/8$, satisfies $n+\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\rceil-3\leq L_\delta(n)\leq n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$. We present a polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm that saturates this bound, achieving a constant factor improvement in sample-complexity over previously known approaches. As an immediate corollary, we obtain via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism an algorithm for learning an unknown $n$-qubit Clifford unitary from $2n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$ queries, the $n$-dependence of which we show to be optimal. Our proof technique, which involves Fourier analysis on the abelian group $\mathbb{Z}_4^n \times \mathbb{F}_2^{n(n-1)/2}$, seems to be qualitatively different to previous approaches to stabilizer state learning, and may be of some independent interest; in particular, it admits natural generalisations to further problems in quantum learning theory.

quant-ph↗