arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2312.01560

RaftGP: Random Fast Graph Partitioning

Abstract

Graph partitioning (GP), a.k.a. community detection, is a classic problem that divides the node set of a graph into densely-connected blocks. Following prior work on the IEEE HPEC Graph Challenge benchmark and recent advances in graph machine learning, we propose a novel RAndom FasT Graph Partitioning (RaftGP) method based on an efficient graph embedding scheme. It uses the Gaussian random projection to extract community-preserving features from classic GP objectives. These features are fed into a graph neural network (GNN) to derive low-dimensional node embeddings. Surprisingly, our experiments demonstrate that a randomly initialized GNN even without training is enough for RaftGP to derive informative community-preserving embeddings and support high-quality GP. To enable the derived embeddings to tackle GP, we introduce a hierarchical model selection algorithm that simultaneously determines the number of blocks and the corresponding GP result. We evaluate RaftGP on the Graph Challenge benchmark and compare the performance with five baselines, where our method can achieve a better trade-off between quality and efficiency. In particular, compared to the baseline algorithm of the IEEE HPEC Graph Challenge, our method is 6.68x -- 23.9x faster on graphs with 1E3 -- 5E4 nodes and at least 64.5x faster on larger (1E5 node) graphs on which the baseline takes more than 1E4 seconds. Our method achieves better accuracy on all test cases. We also develop a new graph generator to address some limitations of the original generator in the benchmark.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yu Gao, Meng Qin, Yibin Ding, Li Zeng, Chaorui Zhang, Weixi Zhang, Wei Han, Rongqian Zhao, Bo Bai. 2023-12-04. RaftGP: Random Fast Graph Partitioning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01560

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Link prediction in complex networks via fusing node centrality and local similarity indices

Local similarity indices are widely used in link prediction on complex networks owing to their low computational cost; however, in sparse networks they assign a zero score to every node pair lacking common neighbors, which severely limits their predictive power. A natural remedy is to fuse node centrality indices with local similarity indices: the former provide global importance for the node pair, while the latter capture fine-grained local topology, and the two can be combined into complementary scores within a unified framework. This paper uses PageRank and DomiRank as two representative centrality measures and constructs a centrality--local-similarity fusion framework. The PageRank-based fusion proposed by Charikhi is first generalized to seven classical local similarity indices, and the universality of its improvement is systematically verified on nine real-world network datasets. Furthermore, the DomiRank centrality is introduced to build the DR-MD series of fused indices under a unified weighting coefficient, which overcomes the drawback that the PageRank-based fusion requires index-by-index weight tuning. Results of five-fold cross-validation together with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests show that, under the unified experimental protocol, all DR-MD indices consistently outperform the corresponding local baselines and their PR-MD counterparts on all nine datasets ($p=0.002$), and that the improvements remain robust against perturbations of $\sigma$ and the weighting coefficients within the near-critical parameter plateau; in particular, DR-RA achieves an average AUC of 0.7084, surpassing global methods such as Katz and RWR as well as several advanced similarity indices. The framework is inherently extensible, and its fusion paradigm can be straightforwardly generalized to couple other node centrality indices with local similarity indices.

cs.SI

Chance, Persistent Advantage, and the Generative-AI Era in Open-Source Package Careers

Studies of careers in science, film, music, and books report a common pattern. When a person's most successful work arrives is close to a random draw over the works they produce. How large their successes tend to be, in contrast, follows a stable, person-specific factor. We test whether this pattern holds for open-source software careers and whether it changed when generative AI coding tools arrived. From the complete public record of GitHub push events (2015-2025), we reconstruct 102.2M career works by 6.15M contributors, and for the 908k contributors whose repositories publish packages, we measure each work's impact by how many downstream packages come to depend on it. First, we find that the timing of a career's biggest hit is close to a lottery over their works, as in science and the arts, with a small, replicable lean toward early career that grows as careers get longer. Second, some coders reliably produce higher-impact work than others, but this lasting personal factor accounts for only part of why impact persists (about a fifth in our primary specification); the rest behaves like momentum, success feeding on itself for a period of time. Third, within the same contributors, this structure did not change after ChatGPT's release. The stable factor's weight grew by about as much as it grew for an earlier cohort that simply aged, and subtracting the effect of aging from the effect of generative AI puts the shift at +0.03 (95% CI [-0.22, +0.23]), indistinguishable from zero. The success pattern documented in science and the arts therefore describes open-source careers too, and it shows no detectable break across the arrival of generative AI. These results have implications for how track records on open platforms should be read and on what to expect from generative AI for the careers built on them.

cs.SI

How neighbourhood ideology shapes misinformation belief in densely tied social networks

With the rapid spread of news on social media, understanding the propagation of misinformation is becoming increasingly important. One factor that affects individuals' vulnerability to false information is their ideological predisposition. Despite the large number of agent-based models that focus on social influence as a driver of the spread of false claims, they often fail to explicitly integrate personal ideological biases into belief formation. In this work, we explore how misinformation spreads through the interaction between individuals' ideological biases and social influence. Our model accounts for both the strength of individuals' ideological biases and the extent to which a false claim aligns with their ideology. Social influence modifies the effects of ideological intensity and false claim alignment through network interactions. Notably, the influence of neighbours' ideological intensity on belief is strongly affected by how well those neighbours are connected to one another. These results highlight the importance of considering both network structure and personal ideological biases when modelling misinformation propagation.

cs.SI