arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2311.16340

New definitions in the theory of Type 1 computable topological spaces

Abstract

In 1957, Lacombe initiated a systematic study of the different possible notions of "computable topological spaces". However, he interrupted this line of research, settling for the idea that "computably open sets should be computable unions of basic open sets". We explain the limits of this approach, which in particular is not general enough to account for all spaces that admit a computable metric. We give a general notion of Type 1 computable topological space that does not rely on a notion of effective basis. Building on the work of Spreen, we show that the use of a $\textit{formal inclusion relation}$ should be systematized. We give the first general definition of the computable topology associated to a computable metric that does not rely on effective separability. This definition can be translated to other constructive settings, and its relevance goes beyond that of Type 1 computability. Finally, we give a new version of a theorem of Moschovakis, by showing that for an appropriate notion of effective basis, the "computably open sets" reduce to "computable unions of basic open sets" on computably separable spaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Emmanuel Rauzy. 2023-11-27. New definitions in the theory of Type 1 computable topological spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO