arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2311.11421

Actors in Multi-Sector Transitions -- Discourse Analysis on Hydrogen in Germany

Nils Ohlendorf·Meike Löhr·Jochen Markard
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With net-zero emission goals, low-carbon transitions enter a new phase of development, leading to new challenges for policymaking and research. Multiple transitions unfold in parallel across different sectors. This involves a broad range of technologies, while actors engage in increasingly complex discourses. Here, we study the discourses on hydrogen in Germany. Based on the analysis of 179 newspaper articles from 2016 to 2020, we find that a diverse set of actors, including many industry incumbents, speak favorably about hydrogen, emphasizing economic opportunities and its relevance for the energy transition, whereas skeptics highlight its low energy efficiency and expected scarcity. With the help of discourse network analysis, we identify three emerging conflicts around the use, production, and import of hydrogen. We explain these conflicts and the widespread support of incumbents with a conceptual framework that captures the complex interplay of sectoral contexts, specific technologies and actor interests.

Explore related subjects

eess.SYcs.SYphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nils Ohlendorf, Meike Löhr, Jochen Markard. 2023-11-19. Actors in Multi-Sector Transitions -- Discourse Analysis on Hydrogen in Germany. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100692

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning State-Action Control Barrier Functions for Model-Free Control under Constraints

Ensuring constraint satisfaction for learning-based control is a critical challenge, especially in the model-free case. While safety filters address this challenge in the model-based setting, they typically rely on predictive models derived from physics or data. This reliance limits their applicability for advanced model-free learning control methods. To address this gap, we propose a new optimization-based control framework that determines safe control inputs directly from data. The benefit of the framework is that both the objective function and the safety constraint can be updated using model-free learning algorithms, enabling performance optimization while maintaining safety. As a key component, the concept of direct data-driven safety filters (3DSF) is first proposed. The framework employs a novel safety certificate, called the state-action control barrier function (SACBF). We present two approaches for synthesizing SACBFs, including learning from an expert controller and reinforcement learning. We develop a robustness framework that guarantees safety and recursive feasibility for the expert-guided approach under learning errors. The proposed control framework bridges the gap between model-free learning-based control and constrained control, by decoupling performance optimization from safety enforcement. Simulations on vehicle control illustrate the superior performance regarding constraint satisfaction and task achievement compared to model-based methods and reward shaping.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Safety Under State Uncertainty: Robustifying Control Barrier Functions

Safety-critical control is a crucial aspect of modern systems, and Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) have gained popularity as the framework of choice for ensuring safety. However, implementing a CBF requires exact knowledge of the true state, a requirement that is often violated in real-world applications where only noisy or estimated state information is available. This paper introduces the notion of Robust Control Barrier Functions (R-CBF) for ensuring safety under such state uncertainty. Crucially, this framework does not require knowledge of the magnitude of uncertainty for the synthesis of a robust safe controller. We formally characterize the class of robustifying terms that ensure robust closed-loop safety and show how a robustly safe controller can be constructed. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through simulations and compare it to existing methods, highlighting the additional robustness and convergence guarantees it provides.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Model Predictive Control with Multiple Constraint Horizons

We propose a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation for nonlinear systems without terminal penalty or dedicated stabilizing terminal set, in which state constraints are enforced heterogeneously along the prediction horizon. In this setting a control-invariant set certifies near-term safety, while a less restrictive set constrains later predictions. This structure is motivated by safety-critical formulations, such as Control Barrier Function (CBF) based MPC, collision avoidance, and robotic receding-horizon planning, where near-term predictions must be certified safe and later predictions can be re-certified in future updates. We develop a value-function-difference analysis separating the effects of constraint-set selection and prediction-horizon length on closed-loop performance bounds, yielding implicit suboptimality certificates. Assuming cost-controllability, we further propose an upper-bound certificate which accounts explicitly for distinct constraint sets, their associated decay rates, and horizons. We also provide a lower-bound certificate for the closed-loop cost beyond the finite-horizon open-loop cost, which, for the admissible parameter range, is not weaker than the standard finite-horizon bound. Simulations on linear and nonlinear safety-critical systems demonstrate the proposed certificates \textit{a priori} and \textit{a posteriori}.

eess.SY↗