arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2310.20325

A polynomial-time $\text{OPT}^\epsilon$-approximation algorithm for maximum independent set of connected subgraphs in a planar graph

Abstract

In the Maximum Independent Set of Objects problem, we are given an $n$-vertex planar graph $G$ and a family $\mathcal{D}$ of $N$ objects, where each object is a connected subgraph of $G$. The task is to find a subfamily $\mathcal{F} \subseteq \mathcal{D}$ of maximum cardinality that consists of pairwise disjoint objects. This problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard and is equivalent to the problem of finding the maximum number of pairwise disjoint polygons in a given family of polygons in the plane. As shown by Adamaszek et al. (J. ACM '19), the problem admits a \emph{quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme} (QPTAS): a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm whose running time is bounded by $2^{\mathrm{poly}(\log(N),1/\epsilon)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, in the polynomial-time regime only the trivial $\mathcal{O}(N)$-approximation is known for the problem in full generality. In the restricted setting where the objects are pseudolines in the plane, Fox and Pach (SODA '11) gave an $N^{\varepsilon}$-approximation algorithm with running time $N^{2^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\varepsilon)}}$, for any $\varepsilon>0$. In this work, we present an $\text{OPT}^{\varepsilon}$-approximation algorithm for the problem that runs in time $N^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\varepsilon^2)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, for any $\varepsilon>0$, thus improving upon the result of Fox and Pach both in terms of generality and in terms of the running time. Our approach combines the methodology of Voronoi separators, introduced by Marx and Pilipczuk (TALG '22), with a new analysis of the approximation factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jana Cslovjecsek, Michał Pilipczuk, Karol Węgrzycki. 2023-10-31. A polynomial-time $\text{OPT}^\epsilon$-approximation algorithm for maximum independent set of connected subgraphs in a planar graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG