arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2310.15087

Atomism Axiomatised Using Mereological Composition as a Primitive Notion

Marcin Łyczak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Atomism is the view that everything is composed of atoms. The view within the framework of the contemporary formal approach is expressed on the ground of mereology with the use of the primitive notion of being a part as every object has at least one atomic part [2, 48], [3, 145], [17, 42], or using mereological fusion [16, 24] which is defined by being a part. We will briefly present a discussion between A. Varzi and A. Shiver concerning the two approaches and propose a new intuitive axiomatic characterization of atomism. We build a system with a primitive notion of composition that holds between individuals and pluralities. We assume only two specific axioms: each object is a unique composition of unique atoms, and being a composition of some objects is equivalent to being the composition of all atoms of these objects. In our approach, notions of part, and atom, are secondary to composition: atom is defined as an object that cannot be a composition of two or more objects, and part is defined as inclusion between atoms. We will show that the theory, with only these two specific axioms, is sufficient to adequately express atomism as we prove that the theory is definitionally equivalent to atomistic extensional mereology with plural quantification allowed and mereological fusion defined. Our theory requires neither full comprehension schema nor the existence of any specific compositions (there are models with only atoms). Therefore, it may constitute the basis on which atomistic concepts of reality are further strengthened, specifically those in which the notion of being a part is not used. To the best of our knowledge, our proposal is the only formal theory of atomism using the primitive notion of composition.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marcin Łyczak. 2023-10-23. Atomism Axiomatised Using Mereological Composition as a Primitive Notion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15087

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗