arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2310.14876

Martian Lava Tube Exploration Using Jumping Legged Robots: A Concept Study

Abstract

In recent years, robotic exploration has become increasingly important in planetary exploration. One area of particular interest for exploration is Martian lava tubes, which have several distinct features of interest. First, it is theorized that they contain more easily accessible resources such as water ice, needed for in-situ utilization on Mars. Second, lava tubes of significant size can provide radiation and impact shelter for possible future human missions to Mars. Third, lava tubes may offer a protected and preserved view into Mars' geological and possible biological past. However, exploration of these lava tubes poses significant challenges due to their sheer size, geometric complexity, uneven terrain, steep slopes, collapsed sections, significant obstacles, and unstable surfaces. Such challenges may hinder traditional wheeled rover exploration. To overcome these challenges, legged robots and particularly jumping systems have been proposed as potential solutions. Jumping legged robots utilize legs to both walk and jump. This allows them to traverse uneven terrain and steep slopes more easily compared to wheeled or tracked systems. In the context of Martian lava tube exploration, jumping legged robots would be particularly useful due to their ability to jump over big boulders, gaps, and obstacles, as well as to descend and climb steep slopes. This would allow them to explore and map such caves, and possibly collect samples from areas that may otherwise be inaccessible. This paper presents the specifications, design, capabilities, and possible mission profiles for state-of-the-art legged robots tailored to space exploration. Additionally, it presents the design, capabilities, and possible mission profiles of a new jumping legged robot for Martian lava tube exploration that is being developed at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jørgen Anker Olsen, Kostas Alexis. 2023-10-23. Martian Lava Tube Exploration Using Jumping Legged Robots: A Concept Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14876

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO